Evidence of the psychological effects of pseudoscientific information about COVID-19 on rural and urban populations

Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jan:295:113628. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113628. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the effects of pseudoscientific information (PI) about COVID-19 on the mental well-being of the general population. A total of 782 participants were classified according to the type of municipality in which they lived (rural municipalities and urban municipalities). The participants answered psychometric questionnaires that assessed psychological well-being, pseudoscientific beliefs and the ability to discriminate between scientific and pseudoscientific information about COVID-19. The results indicated the following: the greater the ability to discriminate between false information and true information, the greater the levels of psychological well-being perceived by the participant. The ability to discriminate predicts up to 32% of psychological well-being only for subjects living in rural municipalities. Residents in urban municipalities showed lower levels of well-being than residents in rural municipalities. It is concluded that new social resources are needed to help the general population of urban municipalities discriminate between pseudoscientific and scientific information.

Keywords: COVID-19; Pseudoscientific Information; Psychological Well-being; SARS-CoV-2; rural municipalities.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • COVID-19*
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Health Literacy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Personal Satisfaction*
  • Rural Population / statistics & numerical data*
  • Urban Population / statistics & numerical data*