Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 3:11:600063.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.600063. eCollection 2020.

Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt?

Affiliations
Review

Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt?

Shuanglong Huang et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

A fundamental process culminating in the mechanisms of plant-pathogen interactions is the regulation of trophic divergence into biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic interactions. Plant hormones, of almost all types, play significant roles in this regulatory apparatus. In plant-pathogen interactions, two classical mechanisms underlying hormone-dependent trophic divergence are long recognized. While salicylic acid dominates in the execution of host defense response against biotrophic and early-stage hemibiotrophic pathogens, jasmonic acid, and ethylene are key players facilitating host defense response against necrotrophic and later-stage hemibiotrophic pathogens. Evidence increasingly suggests that trophic divergence appears to be modulated by more complex signaling networks. Acting antagonistically or agonistically, other hormones such as auxins, cytokinins, abscisic acid, gibberellins, brassinosteroids, and strigolactones, as well as nitric oxide, are emerging candidates in the regulation of trophic divergence. In this review, the latest advances in the dynamic regulation of trophic divergence are summarized, emphasizing common and contrasting hormonal and nitric oxide signaling strategies deployed in plant-pathogen interactions.

Keywords: biotrophs; hemibiotrophs; hormones; necrotrophs; nitric oxide; plant-pathogen interactions; trophic divergence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Hormone crosstalk in directing biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic interactions. During trophic divergence, SA orchestrates both biotrophic and hemibiotrophic interactions, while JA/ET orchestrates both necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic interactions. By interacting with SA, JA/ET, and other hormones, auxin, CK, ABA, GA, BR, and SL as well as their important biosynthesis, transport and response genes, receptors, regulatory components, and transcription factors are all involved in directing trophic divergence, and their crosstalk are widely diversified across these three trophic interactions. Red upward triangle arrows are used to indicate positive regulators for host immunity, and blue downward triangle arrows for negative regulators for host immunity in each specific trophic interaction. Black triangle arrows are denoted for positive regulations in the pathway, while black round arrows for negative regulations in the pathway. Question marks designate potential regulations that require further investigations. Trophic divergence by different hormones are separated by horizontal dotted lines, while different regulatory modules within a trophic interaction are separated by vertical dotted lines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adie B. A., Perez-Perez J., Perez-Perez M. M., Godoy M., Sanchez-Serrano J. J., Schmelz E. A., et al. (2007). ABA is an essential signal for plant resistance to pathogens affecting JA biosynthesis and the activation of defenses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19 1665–1681. 10.1105/tpc.106.048041 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albrecht C., Boutrot F., Segonzac C., Schwessinger B., Gimenez-Ibanez S., Chinchilla D., et al. (2012). Brassinosteroids inhibit pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immune signaling independent of the receptor kinase BAK1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 303–308. 10.1073/pnas.1109921108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali S. S., Kumar G. B. S., Khan M., Doohan F. M. (2013). Brassinosteroid enhances resistance to fusarium diseases of barley. Phytopathology 103 1260–1267. 10.1094/phyto-05-13-0111-r - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson J. P., Badruzsaufari E., Schenk P. M., Manners J. M., Desmond O. J., Ehlert C., et al. (2004). Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate–ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16 3460–3479. 10.1105/tpc.104.025833 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argueso C. T., Ferreira F. J., Epple P., To J. P. C., Hutchison C. E., Schaller G. E., et al. (2012). Two-component elements mediate interactions between cytokinin and salicylic acid in plant immunity. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002448. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002448 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources