Background: Chlamydia trachomatis detection plays a crucial role in early diagnosis and treatment of C. trachomatis infection. In the current study, the capability of sexually transmitted disease (STD) laboratories to detect C. trachomatis was investigated in Guangdong, China.
Methods: An external quality assessment panel, including 5 positive samples with different C. trachomatis loads and 2 negative samples was distributed to 654 participating laboratories in October 2019, and the test results were analyzed by Guangdong Central STD Laboratory. The use of various C. trachomatis detection methods in Guangdong from 2015 to 2019 was also retrospectively investigated.
Results: Of the 654 participating STD laboratories, 559 (85.47%) used immune chromatographic-rapid diagnostic tests (IC-RDTs) to detect C. trachomatis in 2019, and 95 (14.53%) used nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). The rate of NAATs use increased approximately 4-fold from 2015 to 2019. The sensitivity of IC-RDTs decreased markedly from 97.32% to 30.89% with decreasing C. trachomatis load, whereas that of NAATs was 97.62% to 100% in all positive samples. With respect to negative samples the specificity of IC-RDTs was 97.13% to 97.30% and that of NAATs was 98.95% to 100%. Laboratories using IC-RDTs were less likely to detect C. trachomatis than those using NAATs in samples with C. trachomatis loads of 20000 copies/mL or less (P < 0.0001). Further analysis indicated no significant difference (P > 0.05) in detection rate among the 4 IC-RDT assays commonly used by the participating laboratories.
Conclusions: Immune chromatographic-rapid diagnostic tests are commonly used for C. trachomatis detection by many laboratories in Guangdong, but their low sensitivity may lead to missed diagnoses. Nucleic acid amplification tests exhibit high sensitivity and specificity and should be recommended for C. trachomatis detection in STD laboratories.
Copyright © 2020 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. All rights reserved.