Riparian forests in floodplains are occasionally or regularly submerged by flooding. However, controversy exists regarding the effects of flooding on water use in riparian forests, and this controversy severely restricts our ability to better utilize limited water resources to restore damaged riparian forests in arid regions.The evapotranspiration (Et) and transpiration (T) of riparian P. euphratica forests in the arid regions of northwestern China were determined using eddy covariance and sap flow technology across a 3-year period. Fortunately, the flooding introduced by ecological water diversion was occurred in 2014 and 2016 but not in 2015. Our results showed that the magnitude and seasonal pattern of Et across 3 years was comparable (approximately 900 mm), but the T was higher in 2015 (431 mm) than in the other two years (288 mm in 2014 and 290 mm in 2016). The interannual patterns in the transpiration were consistent with the net ecosystem productivity at the site. Given the similar meteorological conditions (e.g. net radiation, temperature, relative humidity, and vapor pressure deficit) among the 3 years, two aspects may contributed to the suppressed tree water use and productivity under flooding: 1) the increased soil salinity reduce the roots water uptake from soil by increasing root water potential via osmotic adjustment; and 2) the depressed tree growth (e.g. the leaf area) via suspended water upward transport along soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Although flooding is widely known beneficial for the regeneration, we suggest that it is not appropriate for the rejuvenation of phreatophyte (e.g., Populus spp.) in arid regions. Our results were drawn from only three years of measurement and therefore longer time series are needed to confirm or refine those conclusions.
Keywords: Evapotranspiration; Flooding; Phreatophytes; Populus euphratica; Riparian forests; Transpiration.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.