Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Effectiveness Review
- PMID: 33350857
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001578
Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Effectiveness Review
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to identify new information evaluating clinically localized prostate cancer therapies.
Materials and methods: Bibliographic databases (2013-January 2020), ClinicalTrials.gov and systematic reviews were searched for controlled studies of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer with duration ≥5 years for mortality and metastases, and ≥1 year for harms.
Results: We identified 67 eligible references. Among patients with clinically, rather than prostate specific antigen, detected localized prostate cancer, watchful waiting may increase mortality and metastases but decreases urinary and erectile dysfunction vs radical prostatectomy. Comparative mortality effect may vary by tumor risk and age but not by race, health status, comorbidities or prostate specific antigen. Active monitoring probably results in little to no mortality difference in prostate specific antigen detected localized prostate cancer vs radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation plus androgen deprivation regardless of tumor risk. Metastases were slightly higher with active monitoring. Harms were greater with radical prostatectomy than active monitoring and mixed between external beam radiation plus androgen deprivation vs active monitoring. 3-Dimensional conformal radiation and androgen deprivation plus low dose rate brachytherapy provided small mortality reductions vs 3-dimensional conformal radiation and androgen deprivation but little to no difference on metastases. External beam radiation plus androgen deprivation vs external beam radiation alone may result in small mortality and metastasis reductions in higher risk disease but may increase sexual harms. Few new data exist on other treatments.
Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality vs watchful waiting in clinically detected localized prostate cancer but causes more harms. Effectiveness may be limited to younger men and those with intermediate risk disease. Active monitoring results in little to no mortality difference vs radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation plus androgen deprivation. Few new data exist on other treatments.
Keywords: androgen antagonists; brachytherapy; male; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):435-48. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00209. Epub 2008 Feb 4. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18252677 Review.
-
Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Sep. Report No.: 20-EHC022. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Sep. Report No.: 20-EHC022. PMID: 32986341 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8. Prescrire Int. 2012. PMID: 23185849 Review.
-
Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment.JAMA. 2024 Jan 23;331(4):302-317. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.26491. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 38261043 Free PMC article.
-
The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):184-90. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs041. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012. PMID: 23271771 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Clinical characteristics and predictors of long-term postoperative urinary incontinence in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity-matched analysis.Int J Urol. 2024 Oct;31(10):1145-1152. doi: 10.1111/iju.15533. Epub 2024 Jul 17. Int J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39016443 Free PMC article.
-
Pro-oncogene FBI-1 inhibits the ferroptosis of prostate carcinoma PC-3 cells via the microRNA-324-3p/GPX4 axis.J Cancer. 2024 Jun 1;15(13):4097-4112. doi: 10.7150/jca.96306. eCollection 2024. J Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38947389 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of factors associated with positive surgical margins and the five-year survival rate after prostate cancer resection and predictive modeling.Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 6;14:1360404. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1360404. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38903708 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of fast-track surgery-oriented care pathways on perioperative rehabilitation indices in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.Am J Transl Res. 2024 May 15;16(5):1620-1629. doi: 10.62347/ZMUX1738. eCollection 2024. Am J Transl Res. 2024. PMID: 38883357 Free PMC article.
-
HIST3H2A promotes the progression of prostate cancer through inhibiting cell necroptosis.BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12308-4. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38684944 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
