Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;141(4S):1104-1110.
doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

TGFβ Signaling in Photoaging and UV-Induced Skin Cancer

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

TGFβ Signaling in Photoaging and UV-Induced Skin Cancer

Yao Ke et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Apr.
Free PMC article

Abstract

UVR is a major etiology for premature skin aging that leads to photoaging and UV-induced skin cancers. In the skin, TGFβ signaling is a growth inhibitor for keratinocytes and a profibrotic factor in the dermis. It exerts context-dependent effects on tumor progression. Chronic UV exposure likely causes TGFβ1/SMAD3 signaling activation and contributes to metalloproteinase-induced collagen degradation and photoinflammation in photoaging. UV irradiation also causes gene mutations in key elements of the TGFβ pathway, including TGFβRI, TGFβRII, SMAD2, and SMAD4. These mutations enable tumor cells to escape from TGFβ-induced growth inhibition and induce genomic instability and cancer stem cells, leading to the initiation, progression, invasion, and metastasis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Furthermore, UV-induced mutations cause TGFβ overexpression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of cSCC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and cutaneous melanoma, resulting in inflammation, angiogenesis, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and immune inhibition, supporting cancer survival, immune evasion, and metastasis. The pleiotropic effects of TGFβ provide possible treatment options for photoaging and skin cancer. Given the high UV-induced mutational burden and immune-repressive TME seen in cSCC, BCC, and cutaneous melanoma, treatment with the combination of a TGFβ signaling inhibitor and immune checkpoint blockade could reverse immune evasion to reduce tumor growth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

KY has no conflict of interests to declare. XJW is a founder and owns shares of Allander Biotechnologies, LLC, which has commercial interests in developing drugs related to regenerative medicine. Work related to the topic of this review was not supported by Allander Biotechnologies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Skin morphology changes in UV-induced premature aging and UV-induced skin cancer.
Chronic UV exposure induces DNA damage and ROS accumulation in the skin. These detrimental factors cause decreased and fragmented collagen and elastic fibers in the dermis that lead to photoaging. Meanwhile, UV radiation generates photoproduct CPDs that cause UV-signature DNA mutations in keratinocytes and epidermal stem cells. These mutations result in cancer initiation and contribute to an inflammatory, angiogenic, and immune inhibitive tumor microenvironment (TME) that supports the progression, invasion, and metastasis of cSCC, BCC, and cutaneous melanoma. ROS, reactive oxygen species; CPDs, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; BCC, basal cell carcinoma.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. The role of TGFβ signaling in the pathogenesis of photoaging and UV-induced skin cancer.
During photoaging, keratinocyte-derived TGFβ production induces photo-inflammation by MMP2, MMP9, and the recruitment of neutrophils, Meanwhile, fibroblasts in the dermis activate TGFβ/Smad3 signaling to induce a fibrotic response. These effects cause damage to collagen fibrils and formation of solar elastosis. In UV-induced skin cancer, TGFβ in the TME activates keratinocytes and endothelial cells, and promotes the generation of CAFs and represses immune cell functions, leading to a TME that favors tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abe M, Oda N, Sato Y, Shibata K, Yamasaki M. Augmented binding and activation of latent transforming growth factor-beta by a tryptic fragment of latency associated peptide. Endothelium 2002;9(1):25–36. - PubMed
    1. Alexandrov LB, Nik-Zainal S, Wedge DC, Aparicio SA, Behjati S, Biankin AV, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 2013;500(7463):415–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annes JP, Munger JS, Rifkin DB. Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation. J Cell Sci 2003;116(Pt 2):217–24. - PubMed
    1. Batlle E, Massagué J. Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling in Immunity and Cancer. Immunity 2019;50(4):924–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berking C, Takemoto R, Schaider H, Showe L, Satyamoorthy K, Robbins P, et al. Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Increases Survival of Human Melanoma through Stroma Remodeling. Cancer Research 2001;61(22):8306–16. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances