Background This study was conducted to assess the relationship between scar burden (extent and severity) and the follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods Patients were referred for viability assessment with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. To measure the transmural extent of LGE in each segment (scar score), we used a five-point scale system. Baseline ejection fraction (EF) and at follow-up were recorded. LVEF classified as non-severe and severely depressed. Results The study included 178 patients (males: 88.8%; mean age: 57.1±10.02 years; mean baseline LVEF: 28.61±10.39). In patients with severe baseline LVEF, the mean scar percentage was higher than that in patients who had non-severe LVEF (38.8±19.41 vs. 24.61±21.21; p˂0.001). On linear regression analysis, aldosterone antagonist and total scar score significantly predicted follow-up ejection fraction (EF) (B=-7.083, p˂0.001 and B=-3.038, p=0.038, respectively). Left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory viability and baseline EF significantly predicted change in EF in patients with LVEF ≤ 35% (B=5.389, p=0.009 and B=-0.581, p˂0.001, respectively). On binary regression analysis for the prediction of at least 5% improvement in EF in patients with baseline EF ≤ 35%, baseline EF and LAD viability were significant (B=-0.15, p=0.014 and B=1.042 and p=0.054, respectively). Conclusions The extent of myocardial scar and viability of LAD territory are identified as the important and independent parameters for the predictions of improvement in EF even after adjustment for demographics and baseline EF and following the standards of care medication.
Keywords: cad; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; ischemic cardiomyopathy; mri cardiac; prognosis; viability.
Copyright © 2020, Aboul Enein et al.