Network-level consequences of outgroup threats in banded mongooses: Grooming and aggression between the sexes
- PMID: 33428240
- DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13323
Network-level consequences of outgroup threats in banded mongooses: Grooming and aggression between the sexes
Abstract
Animal groups are heterogeneous assemblages of individuals with differing fitness interests, which may lead to internal conflict over investment in group territorial defence. Differences between individuals may lead to different behavioural responses to intergroup conflict, particularly between the sexes. These potential impacts have been little studied. We used social network analysis to investigate the impact of simulated intergroup conflicts on social relationships in groups of wild banded mongooses Mungos mungo, in which intergroup fights are more costly for males than females. We predicted that social cohesion (specifically male-to-male and female-to-male grooming) would increase after conflict, and aggression would decrease, to minimize conflict between the sexes. Simulated intergroup conflicts were performed by exposing banded mongoose groups to scents, 'war cry' playbacks, and live intruders from a rival group. All grooming and aggression interactions between individuals were recorded, and grooming and aggression social networks were created for the 2 days preceding a simulated intergroup conflict (pre-conflict network) and the 2 days after (post-conflict network). We found no evidence of an increase in social cohesion after simulated conflicts, measured as grooming eigenvector centrality. Male-to-male, male-to-female and female-to-male grooming strength decreased after simulated intrusions compared to female-to-female grooming strength. However, male-female aggression decreased in intrusion trials compared to other interaction types, consistent with the hypothesis that intergroup encounters reduce the level of intragroup conflict between males and females. Males were more affected socially by intergroup encounters than females, which may be because they are investing in defence rather than internal relationships. Focusing on individual relationship changes, using social network analysis, can reveal changes in the directionality of behaviour in response to intergroup encounters, and highlight how individual responses to conflict may scale up to affect social networks and, potentially, group performance. This study highlights the importance of studying both group-level behaviours and individual relationships to more fully understand responses to intergroup encounters.
Keywords: aggression; grooming; intergroup conflict; social cohesion; social network analysis.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
Similar articles
-
Extended and cumulative effects of experimentally induced intergroup conflict in a cooperatively breeding mammal.Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Dec 8;288(1964):20211743. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1743. Epub 2021 Dec 8. Proc Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34875195 Free PMC article.
-
The dynamics of social cohesion in response to simulated intergroup conflict in banded mongooses.Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec 20;11(24):18662-18675. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8475. eCollection 2021 Dec. Ecol Evol. 2021. PMID: 35003700 Free PMC article.
-
Experimental evidence for delayed post-conflict management behaviour in wild dwarf mongooses.Elife. 2021 Nov 2;10:e69196. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69196. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34725038 Free PMC article.
-
Within-group behavioural consequences of between-group conflict: a prospective review.Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843):20161567. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1567. Proc Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27903869 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Who rises to the challenge? Testing the Challenge Hypothesis in fish, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals.Horm Behav. 2020 Jul;123:104537. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 22. Horm Behav. 2020. PMID: 31181193 Review.
Cited by
-
Extended and cumulative effects of experimentally induced intergroup conflict in a cooperatively breeding mammal.Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Dec 8;288(1964):20211743. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1743. Epub 2021 Dec 8. Proc Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34875195 Free PMC article.
-
Increased alertness and moderate ingroup cohesion in bonobos' response to outgroup cues.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 21;19(8):e0307975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307975. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39167568 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in Lipid Peroxidation in the Ejaculates of Wild Banded Mongooses (Mungos mungo): A Test of the Oxidative Shielding Hypothesis.Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Sep 18;13(9):1124. doi: 10.3390/antiox13091124. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39334783 Free PMC article.
-
Fitness consequences of outgroup conflict.Elife. 2022 Jul 14;11:e74550. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74550. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35833830 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The dynamics of social cohesion in response to simulated intergroup conflict in banded mongooses.Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec 20;11(24):18662-18675. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8475. eCollection 2021 Dec. Ecol Evol. 2021. PMID: 35003700 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adams, E. S., & Mesterton‐Gibbons, M. (2003). Lanchester’s attrition models and fights among social animals. Behavioral Ecology, 14(5), 719–723. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arg061
-
- Arseneau, T. J. M., Taucher, A.‐L., van Schaik, C. P., & Willems, E. P. (2015). Male monkeys fight in between‐group conflicts as protective parents and reluctant recruits. Animal Behaviour, 110, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.09.006
-
- Arseneau‐Robar, T. J. M., Müller, E., Taucher, A.‐L., Van Schaik, C. P., Bshary, R., & Willems, E. P. (2018). Male monkeys use punishment and coercion to de‐escalate costly intergroup fights. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1880). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2323
-
- Arseneau‐Robar, T. J. M., Taucher, A.‐L., Müller, E., Van Schaik, C. P., Bshary, R., & Willems, E. P. (2016). Female monkeys use both the carrot and the stick to promote male participation in intergroup fights. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1843). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1817
-
- Arseneau‐Robar, T. J. M., Taucher, A.‐L., Schnider, A. B., van Schaik, C. P., & Willems, E. P. (2017). Intra‐ and interindividual differences in the costs and benefits of intergroup aggression in female vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 123, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.034
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
