Objectives: To prospectively compare the diagnostic efficacy of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Methods: Multiple b value DWIs were performed using a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit in fifty-one patients with bladder cancer including MIBC and NMIBC confirmed by histopathological findings. DWI data were postprocessed using mono-exponential and DKI models to calculate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), apparent diffusional kurtosis (Kapp), and kurtosis-corrected diffusion coefficient (Dapp). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of all diffusion parameters.
Results: All parameters differed significantly between MIBC and NIMBC including increased Kapp, decreased Dapp and ADC (all p < 0.001). Only the combination of Dapp and Kapp was significantly higher than ADC (p < 0.05), whilst Dapp and Kapp were not statistically different from ADC.
Conclusions: Both conventional DWI and DKI models are beneficial in differentiating between MIBC and NMIBC, whilst the combination of Dapp and Kapp can produce a more robust value than conventional ADC value in evaluating aggressiveness of bladder cancer.
Keywords: Diagnostic efficacy; Diffusion kurtosis imaging; Diffusion-weighted MRI; Urinary bladder neoplasms.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.