The relevance to social interaction modulates bistable biological-motion perception
- PMID: 33450439
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104584
The relevance to social interaction modulates bistable biological-motion perception
Abstract
Social interaction, the process through which individuals act and react toward each other, is arguably the building block of society. As the very first step for successful social interaction, we need to derive the orientation and immediate social relevance of other people: a person facing toward us is much more likely to initiate communications than a person who is back to us. Reversely, however, it remains elusive whether the relevance to social interaction modulates how we perceive the other's orientation. Here, we adopted the bistable point-light walker (PLW) which is ambiguous in its in-depth orientation. Participants were asked to report the orientation (facing the viewer or facing away from the viewer) of the PLWs. Three factors that are task-irrelevant but critically pertinent to social interaction, the distance, the speed, and the size of the PLW, were systematically manipulated. The nearer a person is, the more likely it initiates interactions with us. The larger a person is, the larger influence it may exert. The faster a person is, the shorter time is left for us to respond. Results revealed that participants tended to perceive the PLW as facing them more frequently than facing away when the PLW was nearer, faster, or larger. These same factors produced different patterns of effects on a non-biological rotating cylinder. These findings demonstrate that the relevance to social interaction modulates the visual perception of biological motion and highlight that bistable biological motion perception not only reflects competitions of low-level features but is also strongly linked to high-level social cognition.
Keywords: Biological motion; Bistable perception; Facing bias; Social cognition; Social interaction.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The effect of looming and receding sounds on the perceived in-depth orientation of depth-ambiguous biological motion figures.PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e14725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014725. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21373181 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does anxiety induced by social interaction influence the perception of bistable biological motion?Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103277. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103277. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021. PMID: 33640594
-
The facing bias in biological motion perception: structure, kinematics, and body parts.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):130-43. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0018-1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21258915
-
Further explorations of the facing bias in biological motion perception: perspective cues, observer sex, and response times.PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056978. Epub 2013 Feb 27. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23468898 Free PMC article.
-
Person Perception, Meet People Perception: Exploring the Social Vision of Groups.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 May;17(3):768-787. doi: 10.1177/17456916211017858. Epub 2021 Nov 19. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022. PMID: 34797731 Review.
Cited by
-
Fading boundaries between the physical and the social world: Insights and novel techniques from the intersection of these two fields.Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 13;13:1028150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028150. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36861005 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
