Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 20;12(1):488.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20718-8.

The complex structure of GRL0617 and SARS-CoV-2 PLpro reveals a hot spot for antiviral drug discovery

Affiliations

The complex structure of GRL0617 and SARS-CoV-2 PLpro reveals a hot spot for antiviral drug discovery

Ziyang Fu et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is the pathogen responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. The SARS-CoV-2 papain-like cysteine protease (PLpro) has been implicated in playing important roles in virus maturation, dysregulation of host inflammation, and antiviral immune responses. The multiple functions of PLpro render it a promising drug target. Therefore, we screened a library of approved drugs and also examined available inhibitors against PLpro. Inhibitor GRL0617 showed a promising in vitro IC50 of 2.1 μM and an effective antiviral inhibition in cell-based assays. The co-crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 PLproC111S in complex with GRL0617 indicates that GRL0617 is a non-covalent inhibitor and it resides in the ubiquitin-specific proteases (USP) domain of PLpro. NMR data indicate that GRL0617 blocks the binding of ISG15 C-terminus to PLpro. Using truncated ISG15 mutants, we show that the C-terminus of ISG15 plays a dominant role in binding PLpro. Structural analysis reveals that the ISG15 C-terminus binding pocket in PLpro contributes a disproportionately large portion of binding energy, thus this pocket is a hot spot for antiviral drug discovery targeting PLpro.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A Chinese patent on the application of 6-TG and analogs to treating COVID-19 was filed on June 8, 2020 by Hao Huang, Guoliang Zhang, Jinle Tang, Shuyan Liu, Ziyang Fu and Ming Liu. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Inhibitory activity of GRL0617 against SARS-CoV-2 PLpro.
a The inhibitory activity of GRL0617 and compound 6 against PLpro was measured using the peptide RLRGG-AMC as a substrate. IC50 was presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments. b In-cell deISGylating (left) and deubiquitinating (right) activities of PLpro, HEK293T cells were transfected for 24 h with plasmids encoding GFP-PLpro, ISG15, and E1(Ube1L)/E2(UbcH8)/E3(HECR5) enzymes, alone or in combination. Cells were treated for an additional 24 h with indicated concentrations of GRL0617. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-ubiquitin, anti-ISG15, and anti-GFP antibodies. GAPDH served as a loading control. A representative from three independent experiments is shown. c HEK293T cells were treated with or without 500 U/mL interferon β (IFN-β) for 48 h. The cell extracts were incubated with purified recombinant PLpro (100 nM) and indicated concentrations of GRL0617 for 60 min at 37 °C, followed by immunoblotting analysis with anti-ISG15. A representative from three independent experiments is shown. d Antiviral activity of GRL0617 on SARS-CoV-2 and the cytotoxicity of GRL0617 on Vero E6 cells. Vero E6 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 using a multiplicity-of-infection (MOI) of 0.01. The quantification of absolute viral RNA copies (per mL) in the supernatant at 48 h post-infection was determined by qRT-PCR analysis. The cytotoxicity of GRL0617 on Vero E6 cells was measured using CCK8. All data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments. e EC50 was presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, the cytopathic effect (CPE) analysis revealed an EC50 of 21 ± 2 μM.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Structural and mechanistic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 PLproC111S in complex with GRL0617, and in comparison with SARS-CoV and MERS PLpro.
a Surface and cartoon structures of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro in complex with GRL0617 (orange sticks) showing the N-terminal UBL domain (magenta) and C-terminal USP domain (marine). b The binding pocket of GRL0617 in PLpro. The PLpro residues involved in GRL0617 binding are shown as marine sticks. The 2Fo-Fc omit map (contour level = 1.6 σ, shown as purple mesh). c Schematic diagram of SARS-CoV-2 PLproC111S/GRL0617 interactions shown in (b). d Comparison of GRL0617-bound (marine) PLproC111S and unbound (cyan) PLproC111S (PDB ID: 6WRH [10.2210/pdb6wrh/pdb]) structures. Y268 and Q269 on the BL2 loop shifted toward GRL0617 upon binding. GRL0617 shown as orange sticks; the catalytic triad residues (S111 in place of C111, H272, and D286) are shown in yellow; Y268 and Q269 are shown in marine in bound state, and in cyan in unbound state. e Comparisons of the binding sites of SARS-CoV PLpro/GRL0617 (slate sticks, PDB ID: 3E9S [10.2210/pdb3e9s/pdb]), SARS-CoV-2 PLproC111S/GRL0617 (marine sticks), and MERS-CoV PLpro (deep teal sticks, PDB ID: 4RNA [10.2210/pdb4rna/pdb]).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. NMR studies show that GRL0617 blocks the binding of ISG15 to SARS-CoV-2 PLpro.
a 1H,15N-HSQC spectrum of 15N-ISG15. b HSQC spectrum of 15N-ISG15 (0.1 mM) and 0.15 mM PLpro. Peak broadening and peak intensity loss indicate binding of ISG15 to PLpro. c HSQC spectrum of 15N-ISG15 (0.1 mM) in the mixture of 0.15 mM PLpro and 0.25 mM GRL0617. Recovery of peak intensity suggests that GRL0617 binds to PLpro and displaces ISG15. d SARS-CoV-2 PLproC111S/GRL0617 structure in cartoon model. e ISG15 in the complex structure of human ISG15 C-UBL-PA/SARS-CoV-2 PLpro (PDB 6XA9 [10.2210/pdb6xa9/pdb]) was superimposed on (d) showing steric clash of GRL0617 with the C-terminal tail of ISG15. f Ub in the complex structure of UbPA/SARS-CoV-2 PLpro (PDB 6XAA [10.2210/pdb6xaa/pdb]) was superimposed on (d), showing steric clash of GRL0617 with the C-terminal tail of Ub.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. The C-terminal tail of ISG15 is dominant for binding SARS-CoV-2 PLpro.
a Superposition of the 1H,15N-HSQC spectra of 15N-ISG15-FL (0.1 mM) and the mixture of 15N-ISG15 (0.1 mM)/0.15 mM SARS-CoV-2 PLpro. Massive peak broadening and peak intensity loss indicate binding of ISG15-FL to PLpro. b Superposition of the 1H,15N-HSQC spectra of 15N-ISG15-ΔC6 (0.1 mM) and the mixture of 15N-ISG15-ΔC6 (0.1 mM)/SARS-CoV-2 PLpro (0.15 mM). Negligible peak perturbation indicates minimum binding of ISG15-ΔC6 to PLpro. c ITC measurement for the binding of SARS-CoV-2 with ISG15-FL (black) and ISG15-ΔC6 (blue), respectively. d Structural analysis of the complex structure of ISG15/SARS-CoV-2 PLpro (PDB 6XA9 [10.2210/pdb6xa9/pdb]) shows that the sidechains (black dashed lines) of D164 and E167 of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro are involved in the binding with the C-terminal tail of ISG15, other interactions are involved with the backbone (red dashed lines). e DUB cleavage assay using Ub-AMC, ISG15-AMC, or peptide-AMC shows that D164A and E167A mutants have impaired enzyme activity compared with wild-type SARS-CoV-2 PLpro. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. The extensive hydrogen-bond and electrostatic interaction network between ISG15 C-terminus and SARS-CoV-2 PLpro.
a The complex structure of human ISG15 C-UBL domain and SARS-CoV-2 PLpro (PDB 6XA9 [https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb6xa9/pdb]). b Close-up view for interactions of the C-terminus of ISG15 (green) with PLpro (marine), sidechain interactions in black dashed lines, and backbone interactions in red dashed lines. c Surface model showing the superposition of the C-terminus of ISG15 on apo-PLpro (PDB 6W9C [10.2210/pdb6w9c/pdb]). d Surface model showing the C-terminus of ISG15 in PLpro (PDB 6XA9 [10.2210/pdb6xa9/pdb]). e Cartoon model showing the shift of BL2 loop from the apo-state (orange) to bound state (marine), a distance of 4.5 Å was labeled for the shifting of sidechain η-OH of Y268 in PLpro.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. GRL0617 occupies the same binding pocket in the USP domain as other USP7 and USP14 inhibitors.
a Binding pocket of GRL0617 (orange) in SARS-CoV-2 PLproC111S mutant (PDB 7CJM [10.2210/pdb7cjm/pdb]), the S111 was labeled in place of C111. b Binding pocket of FT671 (PDB 5NGE [10.2210/pdb5gne/pdb], pink), XL188 (PDB 5VS6 [10.2210/pdb5vs6/pdb], cyan), and ALM2 (PDB 5N9R [10.2210/pdb5n9r/pdb], purple) in USP7 with active Cys223 label. c Binding pocket of IU1 (yellow) in USP14 (PDB 6IIK [10.2210/pdb6iik/pdb]) with active Cys114 label; the BL1 and BL2 loops were labeled in (a, b, c). d Superposition of GRL0617, USP7, and USP14 in the ISG15 C-terminus binding pocket in SARS-CoV-2 PLpro.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-2019) Situation Reports-176https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situatio... (WHO, 2020).
    1. Zhou P, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu F, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579:265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu R, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565–574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan JF, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020;395:514–523. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms