[Methodological Standard for the Development of Quality Indicators within Clinical Practice Guidelines - Results of a structured consensus process]

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Feb;160:21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Background: Recommendations of evidence- and formally consensus-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) represent a valuable source of quality indicators (QIs). Nevertheless, a standardized methodological procedure for developing QIs in the context of CPGs does not yet exist in Germany for all CPGs. For this reason, a methodological standard for the guideline-based development of QIs (QI Standard) was developed based on a structured consensus process involving multiple key stakeholders.

Methods: The proposed content of the QI Standard was derived from evidence, drawing upon results of reviews and qualitative studies, and considered German manuals for guideline-based QI development of two guideline programs. A multi-perspective consensus panel, broadly representing key stakeholders from the German healthcare system with expertise in CPGs and/or quality management, was nominated to vote on recommendations for guideline-based development of QIs. The iterative, structured consensus process included a two-stage online survey based on the Delphi method ("preliminary voting") and a moderated final stakeholder conference where all those recommendations were definitely included in the QI Standard that received approval of more than 75 % (consensus criterion) of the consensus panel.

Results: Based on the agreed QI Standard, the QI development process starts with a criteria-based selection of "potential" QIs which - in case of adoption - are published in CPGs as "preliminary" QIs and can achieve the status "final" after successful testing. The QI Standard is composed of a total of 30 recommendations, which are allocated to six areas: A) preparatory work steps for the guideline-based recommendation of QIs, B) QI development group and cooperation with the CPG group, C) development of potential QIs, D) critical appraisal of potential QIs, E) formal adoption and publication as well as F) piloting/testing of preliminary QIs and conversion into final QIs.

Discussion: Before the QI Standard can be recommended for implementation in future CPGs, it should have been successfully tested in selected German CPG projects. In addition to methodological requirements for the QI development, it must be ensured that guideline groups have adequate resources for the implementation of the QI Standard.

Conclusion: By using the QI Standard, scientifically sound and healthcare-relevant QIs can be expected.

Keywords: Clinical practice guideline; Consensus; Evidence-based; Evidenzbasiert; Konsens; Leitlinie; Quality assurance; Quality indicator; Quality of healthcare; Qualitätsindikator; Versorgungsqualität.

MeSH terms

  • Consensus
  • Delivery of Health Care*
  • Germany
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care*
  • Reference Standards