Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 13:11:610231.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.610231. eCollection 2020.

Relative Influence of Plastic Debris Size and Shape, Chemical Composition and Phytoplankton-Bacteria Interactions in Driving Seawater Plastisphere Abundance, Diversity and Activity

Affiliations

Relative Influence of Plastic Debris Size and Shape, Chemical Composition and Phytoplankton-Bacteria Interactions in Driving Seawater Plastisphere Abundance, Diversity and Activity

Jingguang Cheng et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

The thin film of life that inhabits all plastics in the oceans, so-called "plastisphere," has multiple effects on the fate and impacts of plastic in the marine environment. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relative influence of the plastic size, shape, chemical composition, and environmental changes such as a phytoplankton bloom in shaping the plastisphere abundance, diversity and activity. Polyethylene (PE) and polylactide acid (PLA) together with glass controls in the forms of meso-debris (18 mm diameter) and large-microplastics (LMP; 3 mm diameter), as well as small-microplastics (SMP) of 100 μm diameter with spherical or irregular shapes were immerged in seawater during 2 months. Results of bacterial abundance (confocal microscopy) and diversity (16S rRNA Illumina sequencing) indicated that the three classical biofilm colonization phases (primo-colonization after 3 days; growing phase after 10 days; maturation phase after 30 days) were not influenced by the size and the shape of the materials, even when a diatom bloom (Pseudo-nitzschia sp.) occurred after the first month of incubation. However, plastic size and shape had an effect on bacterial activity (3H leucine incorporation). Bacterial communities associated with the material of 100 μm size fraction showed the highest activity compared to all other material sizes. A mature biofilm developed within 30 days on all material types, with higher bacterial abundance on the plastics compared to glass, and distinct bacterial assemblages were detected on each material type. The diatom bloom event had a great impact on the plastisphere of all materials, resulting in a drastic change in diversity and activity. Our results showed that the plastic size and shape had relatively low influence on the plastisphere abundance, diversity, and activity, as compared to the plastic composition or the presence of a phytoplankton bloom.

Keywords: biofilm; biofouling; colonization; microbial ecotoxicology; plastic litter; plastisphere.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Confocal microscopy for polyethylene irregular microbeads of around 100 μm diameter (PE IR) and 3 mm film (PE 3 mm) at days 3 (D3), 10 (D10), 30 (D30), and 66 (D66). Scale bar: 50 μm. Arrows are pointing typical shape of diatoms that appeared at D66 only.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Bacterial cell counts per surface area (mm– 2) for PE, PLA and glass on mesoplastics (18 mm diameter), large microplastics (3 mm diameter) and small microplastics microbeads (100 μm diameter) with irregular (IR) or regular spherical shapes (RE) during the course of the experiment at days 3 (D3), 10 (D10), 30 (D30), and 66 (D66).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Bacterial heterotrophic production (BP, pgC mm– 2 h– 1) (A) and bacterial activity (fg C cell– 1 h– 1) (B) for PE, PLA and glass on larger pieces (18 mm diameter), microplastics (3 mm diameter) and irregular (IR) or regular spherical (RE) microbeads (100 μm diameter) during the course of the experiment at days 3 (D3), 10 (D10), 30 (D30), and 66 (D66).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Alpha-diversity indices of (A) richness (Chao1), (B) evenness (Pielou), and (C) diversity (Shannon) of all the materials (PE, PLA, glass) and the surrounding seawater during the course of the experiment at days 3 (D3), 10 (D10), 30 (D30), and 66 (D66). The boxplots show the median between triplicate samples of different sizes for each material (heavy horizontal line inside the boxes), the box represents the first and third quartiles and unfilled circles indicate outliers. Lowercase letters (a, b, c) denote statistically different groups (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Comparison of temporal variation of taxonomic abundances and community structure of bacteria in seawater (SW) and biofilms of different materials (PE, PLA and glass) according to immersion time in days (D), by cumulative bar charts comparing relative abundances (left) and by UPGMA dendrogram based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities between 16S rRNA-based sequencing profiles (right).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Bubble plot showing the relative abundance of the majority ASVs (>5%). Each dot corresponds to the average abundance among different size (18 mm, 3 mm, IR and RE). The closest taxonomic affiliation of each ASV was shown on the left of the panel. Black filled color indicates significant difference between seawater and different materials (PE, PLA, and glass) considering all sampling date (Welch’s ANOVA test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abed R. M. M., Al Fahdi D., Muthukrishnan T. (2019). Short-term succession of marine microbial fouling communities and the identification of primary and secondary colonizers. Biofouling 35 526–540. 10.1080/08927014.2019.1622004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abràmoff M. D., Magalhães P. J., Ram S. J. (2004). Image processing with imageJ. Biophotonics Int. 11 36–41.
    1. Amaral-Zettler L. A., Zettler E. R., Mincer T. J. (2020). Ecology of the plastisphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18 139–151. 10.1038/s41579-019-0308-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amaral-Zettler L. A., Zettler E. R., Slikas B., Boyd G. D., Melvin D. W., Morrall C. E., et al. (2015). The biogeography of the Plastisphere: implications for policy. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13 541–546. 10.1890/150017 - DOI
    1. Anderson M. J., Walsh D. C. I. (2013). PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol. Monogr. 83 557–574. 10.1890/12-2010.1 - DOI