Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 13;7(3):eabd6696.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd6696. Print 2021 Jan.

Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns

Zongbo Shi et al. Sci Adv. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The COVID-19 lockdowns led to major reductions in air pollutant emissions. Here, we quantitatively evaluate changes in ambient NO2, O3, and PM2.5 concentrations arising from these emission changes in 11 cities globally by applying a deweathering machine learning technique. Sudden decreases in deweathered NO2 concentrations and increases in O3 were observed in almost all cities. However, the decline in NO2 concentrations attributable to the lockdowns was not as large as expected, at reductions of 10 to 50%. Accordingly, O3 increased by 2 to 30% (except for London), the total gaseous oxidant (O x = NO2 + O3) showed limited change, and PM2.5 concentrations decreased in most cities studied but increased in London and Paris. Our results demonstrate the need for a sophisticated analysis to quantify air quality impacts of interventions and indicate that true air quality improvements were notably more limited than some earlier reports or observational data suggested.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Concept of detrending air pollutant levels.
C2016–2019 and C2020 are the average concentrations of an air pollutant in the second and third weeks before the lockdown start date or equivalent in 2016–2019 and 2020, respectively; Ci,2016–2019 and Ci,2020 are the daily average concentrations of an air pollutant in the ith day starting in the second week after the lockdown start date or equivalent in 2016–2019 and 2020, respectively. The vertical dashed line represents lockdown start date. P2016–2019 and P2020 are the percentage changes in air pollutant levels after versus before the lockdown began or equivalent in 2016–2019 and 2020, respectively (see Eq. 2 in the main text for definition). C2020Business as usual is the hypothetical concentration for the ith day starting in the second week after the lockdown date under “business-as-usual” (i.e., no lockdown) conditions. This is calculated from the prelockdown concentration (C2020) assuming the same percentage change as in 2016–2019 (P2016–2019, as the “business-as-usual” change). The detrended percentage change P* (i.e., the change in air pollutant concentration arising from lockdown effects alone) is given by P2020P2016–2019.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Observed and deweathered daily NO2 and O3 concentrations in selected cities before and after the lockdown start dates or equivalent in 2020 versus 2018.
Columns correspond to (A) NO2 at roadside sites, (B) NO2 at urban background sites, and (C) O3 at urban background sites; rows show different cities as indicated. Fine and heavy lines indicate observed and deweathered concentrations, respectively. Data are shown from December to May, shown as day of year (DOY; 1 January = 1), where the vertical dashed lines represent lockdown date. The sudden drop in deweathered NO2 and corresponding increase in deweathered O3 are apparent in Beijing, Wuhan, and Paris, whereas London and Los Angeles show more gradual changes. The saw-like shape in the deweathered data in some cities captures the weekly cycles of NO2 and, to a lesser extent, O3, particularly in western cities. Results from other cities/sites are shown in fig. S1. No data are available for roadside sites in Wuhan.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Box plots of percentage change (Pdew) in deweathered concentrations of air pollutants in 2020 versus 2016–2019.
Rows represent (A) NO2, (B) O3, (C) PM2.5, and (D) Ox. Lower and upper box boundaries represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; line and triangle inside boxes represent median and mean values, respectively; lower and upper error lines represent 1.5 * IQR (interquartile range) below the third quartile and above the first quartile, respectively. Number of samples for Pdew in 2020 and 2016–2019 is usually 28 and 112, respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Observed and deweathered Ox (i.e., NO2+ O3) mixing ratios in the 5 weeks before and after the lockdown start dates in the studied cities in 2020.
The six rows (from top to bottom) show results from roadside observed (A) and deweathered (B), urban background observed (C) and deweathered (D), and rural observed (E) and deweathered (F) mixing ratios. Deweathered Ox shows little change before and after the lockdown dates in 2020 and is similar across all urban background sites (all close to 40 ppb). Error bars (included for all points) represent 1 SD (n = 14). Transition period refers to the 2 weeks with the lockdown start date in the middle.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Observed and deweathered daily PM2.5 concentrations in the selected cities before and after the lockdown start dates or equivalent in 2020 versus 2018.
Columns correspond to (A) roadside, (B) urban background, and (C) rural sites; rows show different cities as indicated. Fine and heavy lines indicate observed and deweathered concentrations, respectively. Data are shown from December to May, shown as day of year (1 January = 1), where the vertical dashed lines represent lockdown start date. Results from other cities/sites are shown in fig. S2. No data are available for roadside sites in Wuhan.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lelieveld J., Pozzer A., Pöschl U., Fnais M., Haines A., Münzel T., Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: A worldwide perspective. Cardiovasc. Res. 116, 1910–1917 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Bank Group, The Cost of Air Pollution: Strengthening the Economic Case for Action (English) (2016); http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/781521473177013155/The-cost-of....
    1. Ogen Y., Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels as a contributing factor to coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality. Sci. Total Environ. 726, 138605 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fattorini D., Regoli F., Role of the chronic air pollution levels in the COVID-19 outbreak risk in Italy. Environ. Pollut. 264, 114732 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le Quéré C., Jackson R. B., Jones M. W., Smith A. J., Abernethy S., Andrew R. M., De-Gol A. J., Willis D. R., Shan Y., Canadell J. G., Friedlingstein P., Creutzig F., Peters G. P., Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 647–653 (2020).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources