Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 13;6(1):25-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.11.008. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Proteomic Architecture of Valvular Extracellular Matrix: FNDC1 and MXRA5 Are New Biomarkers of Aortic Stenosis

Affiliations

Proteomic Architecture of Valvular Extracellular Matrix: FNDC1 and MXRA5 Are New Biomarkers of Aortic Stenosis

Rihab Bouchareb et al. JACC Basic Transl Sci. .

Abstract

This study analyzed the expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins during aortic valve calcification with mass spectrometry, and further validated in an independent human cohort using RNAseq data. The study reveals that valve calcification is associated with significant disruption in ECM and metabolic pathways, and highlights a strong connection between metabolic markers and ECM remodeling. It also identifies FNDC1 and MXRA5 as novel ECM biomarkers in calcified valves, electing them as potential targets in the development and progression of aortic stenosis.

Keywords: AS, aortic stenosis; EC, endothelial cell; ECM; ECM, extracellular matrix; FN, fibronectin; FNDC1, fibronectin type III domain containing 1; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MXRA5, matrix-remodeling-associated protein 5; MetS, metabolic syndrome; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RNA-Seq; RNAseq, RNA sequencing; TAVc, calcified tricuspid aortic valve; TAVn, noncalcified tricuspid aortic valve; VAHC, calcified human aortic valve; VAHN, normal human aortic valve; aortic stenosis; calcified aortic valves; hVIC, human valve interstitial cell; metabolism; proteomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Bouchareb was supported in part by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant T32 HL7824-19; Dr. Lebeche was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01HL137220. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of ECM Pipeline Extraction From Human Aortic Valve Tissue (A) Macroscopic analysis of calcified valve tissue. (B) Dissection of fibrotic stage tissue. (C) Dissection of calcified stage tissue. (D) Diagram to compare proteome between noncalcified, low-calcified, and highly calcified tissue from the same aortic valve. (E) ECM extraction process. (F) Alizarin Red staining of noncalcified valve versus (G) staining of calcified valve with calcium nodes highlighted with yellow rectangles the corresponding dispersive x-ray energy graphs showing the calcium peak (circled) are below each section. Proteins were isolated from the calcified (yellow rectangle) and noncalcified (green) stages of the same valve tissue. Masson trichrome staining of (H) a calcified valve and (I) a control noncalcified valve. The high-calcium samples were taken from the area indicated by the black highlighted box (I) and the low-calcium samples from the area indicated by the red highlighted box. ECM = extracellular matrix; LC-MS/MS = liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representation of the Top 20 Significant Proteins in the 3 Disease Stages Core matrisome proteins are highlighted in red. (A) Significant ECM proteins between highly calcified (HIGH) and control valve (VAHN) tissues. (B) Significant ECM proteins between low-calcified (LOW) and control valve tissues. (C) Significant ECM proteins between high- and low-calcified tissues from the same valve are labeled with asterisks. (D) Venn diagram showing the comparison of the proteomes in the 3 different stages. ECM = extracellular matrix; VAHN = normal human aortic valve.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Heat Map Representation of ECM Proteins in the 3 Different Stages (A) Comparing highly calcified tissue (VAHC-HIGH) to control valve (VAHN) tissue. (B) Low calcified tissue (VAHC-LOW) compared with VAHN. (C) Low calcified stage compared with high calcified stage tissue in the same valve. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Network Analysis Surrounding ECM Proteins (A) Network of significant proteins when comparing high calcified to control valve tissues (VAHN). (B) The network between low-calcified tissue and control valves. Orange circle outline = core matrisome protein, yellow circle outline = matrisome-associated protein, green dot = up-regulated, red dot = down-regulated. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
IF Staining of Selected Proteins Immunofluorescence (IF) staining (left) and quantification (right) show the up-regulation of osteopontin, versican, and fibronectin, and down-regulation of TUBA4 in calcified (VAHC) versus noncalcified (VAHN) valves (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Characterization of Human Aortic Valve Cells (A) Isolated human valve cells are positive for vimentin and αSMA as shown with both immunofluorescence and Western blotting. Boxed areas (left) are shown at higher magnification on the right. (B) Treatment of cells with phosphate-based calcifying medium enhanced the expression of α-SMA. (C) Diagram showing the process followed to screen extracellular matrix expression during valve calcification. CTL = control.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Human Valve Cell Calcification In Vitro (A) Human valve interstitial cells (hVICs) were treated with phosphate-based calcifying medium (CM) for 7 days. Calcium nodes were stained with Alizarin Red and observed with a polarized light microscope. The dashed-line boxes indicate the regions shown at higher magnification in the solid-line boxes. (B) The quantification of calcium was performed with Arsenazo III comparing control (CTL) with cells treated with CM. Scanning electron microscopy analyses shows (C) noncalcified cells and (D) calcified nodes in phosphate-treated cells. Boxed areas (left) are shown at higher magnification on the right. Calcium nodes are highlighted with an artificial green color. Calcium nodes were revealed with energy dispersive x-ray to show their hydroxyapatite nature. Calcium nodes were revealed with energy dispersive x-ray, in black eclipse, to show their hydroxyapatite nature (C, D). ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Figure 8
Figure 8
ECM Expression During Valve Cell Calcification In Vitro (A) Venn diagram showing cellular and secreted proteins during calcification. (B) Top 20 secreted proteins expressed, with comparison of their expression at 0, 3, and 7 days of calcifying medium treatment. ECM proteins are labeled in red. (C) Venn diagram showing cellular protein expression at 0, 3, and 7 days. ECM = extracellular matrix.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stewart B.F., Siscovick D., Lind B.K. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:630–634. - PubMed
    1. Rajamannan N.M., Evans F.J., Aikawa E. Calcific aortic valve disease: not simply a degenerative process: a review and agenda for research from the National Heart and Lung and Blood Institute Aortic Stenosis Working Group. Executive summary: calcific aortic valve disease-2011 update. Circulation. 2011;124:1783–1791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briand M., Lemieux I., Dumesnil J.G. Metabolic syndrome negatively influences disease progression and prognosis in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2229–2236. - PubMed
    1. Owens D.S., Katz R., Takasu J., Kronmal R., Budoff M.J., O'Brien K.D. Incidence and progression of aortic valve calcium in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:701–708. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wenaweser P., Pilgrim T., Kadner A. Clinical outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk according to treatment modality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2151–2162. - PubMed