Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036330.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36330.

Association of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

Affiliations

Association of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Erratum in

  • Errors in the Results Section of the Abstract.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e213659. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3659. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33662128 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Proponents of novel transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) suggest the procedure overcomes the technical and oncologic challenges of conventional approaches for treating rectal cancer. Recently, however, there has been controversy regarding the oncologic safety of the procedure.

Objective: To assess the association of transanal TME with the incidence of local recurrence (LR) of cancer and the probability of remaining free of LR during follow-up.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study used data from 8 high-volume rectal cancer academic institutions from across Canada on all consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer treated by transanal TME at the participating centers. The study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2018, and data were analyzed from April 1, 2020, to September 15, 2020.

Exposure: Transanal TME.

Main outcomes and measures: The incidence of LR was reported as a direct measure of quality of resection. The cumulative probability of LR- and systemic recurrence (SR)-free survival at 36 months was estimated. Local recurrence and SR were defined as radiologic or endoscopic evidence of 1 or more new lesions in or outside the pelvis, respectively, documented during surveillance after the removal of the primary tumor.

Results: Of 608 total patients included in the analysis, 423 (69.6%) were male; the median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-70 years). Local recurrence was identified in 22 patients (3.6%) after a median follow-up of 27 months (IQR, 18-38 months). The median time to LR was 13 months (IQR, 9-19 months). Sixteen of the 22 patients with LR (72.7%) were male, 14 (63.6%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and 12 (54.5%) had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III disease. Of those with LR, 16 (72.7%) had a negative circumferential radial margin and 20 (90.9%) had a negative distal resection margin, 2 (9.1%) experienced conversion to open surgery, and 15 (68.2%) also developed SR. The probability of LR-free survival at 36 months was 96% (95% CI, 94%-98%). According to the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the hazard ratio of LR was estimated to be 4.2 (95% CI, 2.9-6.2) times higher among patients with a positive circumferential radial margin than among those with a negative circumferential radial margin.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, transanal TME performed by experienced surgeons was associated with an incidence of LR and SR that is in line with the published literature on open and laparoscopic TME, suggesting that transanal TME may be an acceptable approach for management of rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Caycedo-Marulanda reported receiving personal fees from Ethicon, CONMED, and Southmedic outside the submitted work. Dr Lee reported receiving grants from Johnson & Johnson and personal fees from Stryker outside the submitted work. Dr Brown reported receiving personal fees from Ethicon and grants from Medtronic outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Kaplan-Meier Curves Presenting the Probability of Local Recurrence-Free, Systemic Recurrence-Free, and Disease-Free Survival During the Course of the Study
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Curves Presenting the Probability of Being Free of Local Recurrence or Systemic Recurrence During the Course of the Study, Stratified by Circumferential Radial Margin (CRM) or Distal Resection Margin (DRM) Status

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(5):1205-1210. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0965-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. ; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group . Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210-218. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. . Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(7):637-645. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. . Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):767-774. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638-1645. doi:10.1002/bjs.7160 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms