Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 10;21(1):131.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06108-w.

Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions

Affiliations

Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions

Olga A Vsevolozhskaya et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Since October 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has penalized 25% of U.S. hospitals with the highest rates of hospital-acquired conditions under the Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program (HACRP). While early evaluations of the HACRP program reported cumulative reductions in hospital-acquired conditions, more recent studies have not found a clear association between receipt of the HACRP penalty and hospital quality of care. We posit that some of this disconnect may be driven by frequent scoring updates. The sensitivity of the HACRP penalties to updates in the program's scoring methodology has not been independently evaluated.

Methods: We used hospital discharge records from 14 states to evaluate the association between changes in HACRP scoring methodology and corresponding shifts in penalty status. To isolate the impact of changes in scoring methods over time, we used FY2018 hospital performance data to calculate total HAC scores using FY2015 through FY2018 CMS scoring methodologies.

Results: Comparing hospital penalty status based on various HACRP scoring methodologies over time, we found a significant overlap between penalized hospitals when using FY 2015 and 2016 scoring methodologies (95%) and between FY 2017 and 2018 methodologies (46%), but substantial differences across early vs later years. Only 15% of hospitals were eligible for penalties across all four years. We also found significant changes in a hospital's (relative) ranking across the various years, indicating that shifts in penalty status were not driven by small changes in HAC scores clustered around the penalty threshold.

Conclusions: HACRP penalties have been highly sensitive to program updates, which are generally announced after performance periods are concluded. This disconnect between performance and penalties calls into question the ability of the HACRP to improve patient safety as intended.

Keywords: Health policy; Hospital acquired conditions reduction program (HACRP); Hospital quality; Patient safety; Quality improvement; Quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Total HACRP penalties (in millions) by fiscal year based on RAND hospital data [25] merged with total HAC scores, FYs 2015-2018
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percent overlap in penalized hospitals among FY 2015-2018 scoring methodologies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Scorecard on Rates of Hospital-Acquired Conditions 2010 to 2015: Interim Data From National Efforts To Make Health Care Safer. 2016. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/2015-interim.html. Accessed 9 Sep 2020.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ National Scorecard on Hospital-Acquired Conditions Updated Baseline Rates and Preliminary Results 2014–2017. 2019. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/index.html. Accessed 9 Sep 2020.
    1. Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Englesbe MJ, Ryan AM. Hospital-acquired condition reduction program is not associated with additional patient safety improvement. Health Aff. 2019;38(11):1858–65. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan DM, Kamdar N, Regenbogen SE, Krapohl G, Swenson C, Pearlman M, Campbell Jr DA, Hendren S. Evaluation of the methods used by medicare’s hospital-acquired condition reduction program to identify outlier hospitals for surgical site infection. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227(3):346–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.06.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sankaran R, Sukul D, Nuliyalu U, Gulseren B, Engler TA, Arntson E, Zlotnick H, Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the us hospital acquired condition reduction program: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2019;366:4109. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed