Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 10;16(1):27.
doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00882-0.

Delivering fracture prevention services to rural US veterans through telemedicine: a process evaluation

Karla L Miller  1   2   3 , Melissa J Steffen  4   5   6 , Kimberly D McCoy  5   6 , Grant Cannon  7 , Aaron T Seaman  5   8 , Zachary L Anderson  4   9 , Shardool Patel  4   9   10 , Janiel Green  4   11 , Shylo Wardyn  5 , Samantha L Solimeo  5   6   8
Affiliations

Delivering fracture prevention services to rural US veterans through telemedicine: a process evaluation

Karla L Miller et al. Arch Osteoporos. .

Erratum in

Abstract

An informatics-driven population bone health clinic was implemented to identify, screen, and treat rural US Veterans at risk for osteoporosis. We report the results of our implementation process evaluation which demonstrated BHT to be a feasible telehealth model for delivering preventative osteoporosis services in this setting.

Purpose: An established and growing quality gap in osteoporosis evaluation and treatment of at-risk patients has yet to be met with corresponding clinical care models addressing osteoporosis primary prevention. The rural bone health tea m (BHT) was implemented to identify, screen, and treat rural Veterans lacking evidence of bone health care and we conducted a process evaluation to understand BHT implementation feasibility.

Methods: For this evaluation, we defined the primary outcome as the number of Veterans evaluated with DXA and a secondary outcome as the number of Veterans who initiated prescription therapy to reduce fracture risk. Outcomes were measured over a 15-month period and analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data to understand successful implementation were collected concurrently by conducting interviews with clinical personnel interacting with BHT and BHT staff and observations of BHT implementation processes at three site visits using the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework.

Results: Of 4500 at-risk, rural Veterans offered osteoporosis screening, 1081 (24%) completed screening, and of these, 37% had normal bone density, 48% osteopenia, and 15% osteoporosis. Among Veterans with pharmacotherapy indications, 90% initiated therapy. Qualitative analyses identified barriers of rural geography, rural population characteristics, and the infrastructural resource requirement. Data infrastructure, evidence base for care delivery, stakeholder buy-in, formal and informal facilitator engagement, and focus on teamwork were identified as facilitators of implementation success.

Conclusion: The BHT is a feasible population telehealth model for delivering preventative osteoporosis care to rural Veterans.

Keywords: Fracture; Primary prevention; Rural; Telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Rural BHT clinical process workflow
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Williams ST, et al. A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(11):3107–3111. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4172-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khosla S, et al. Addressing the crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis: a path forward. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;32(3):424–430. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Force, U.S.P.S.T Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):356–364. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00307. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cosman F, et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359–2381. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim LS, et al. Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(4):366–375. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.013. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types