The Comeback of the IUD in Twenty-First Century USA

J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2021 Apr 8;76(2):191-216. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrab004.

Abstract

From 1995 to 2014, intrauterine devices (IUDs) rose from ranking 10th (out of 11) among contraceptive methods to being the fourth most popular, outnumbered only by the pill, sterilization, and condoms. In 1995, the IUD had been largely abandoned by American doctors; two decades later, major medical associations promoted it as a "first line" method for prospective users of all ages. This paper explains the rapid and dramatic increase in intrauterine contraception by exploring three influential factors from the 1970s-1980s - the Dalkon Shield disaster, the lack of innovation in contraceptive research and development, and the moral panic over teen pregnancy in America - that created circumstances by the early 2000s in which health care providers became more receptive to long-acting reversible contraception. Key thought leaders in obstetrics and gynecology took it upon themselves to rehabilitate the IUD in the court of medical opinion and succeeded in securing professional approval of the device as the initial step in its resurrection.

Keywords: Mirena; Paragard; birth control; intrauterine device (IUD); long-acting reversible contraception (LARC); obstetrician-gynecologists; reproductive justice; teenage pregnancy.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Contraception / history*
  • Contraception / psychology
  • Contraception / trends
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • History, 20th Century
  • History, 21st Century
  • Humans
  • Intrauterine Devices / adverse effects
  • Intrauterine Devices / history*
  • Intrauterine Devices / trends
  • United States