Who is (not) complying with the U. S. social distancing directive and why? Testing a general framework of compliance with virtual measures of social distancing

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247520. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

A study involving over 2000 online participants (US residents) tested a general framework regarding compliance with a directive in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study featured not only a self-report measure of social distancing but also virtual behavior measures-simulations that presented participants with graphical depictions mirroring multiple real-world scenarios and asked them to position themselves in relation to others in the scene. The conceptual framework highlights three essential components of a directive: (1) the source, some entity is advocating for a behavioral change; (2) the surrounding context, the directive is in response to some challenge; and (3) the target, the persons to whom the directive is addressed. Belief systems relevant to each of these three components are predicted, and were found, to relate to compliance with the social distancing directive. The implications of the findings for public service campaigns encouraging people to engage in social distancing are discussed.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • COVID-19 / epidemiology
  • COVID-19 / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pandemics
  • Patient Compliance / psychology*
  • Patient Compliance / statistics & numerical data
  • Physical Distancing*
  • SARS-CoV-2 / isolation & purification
  • Self Report
  • United States / epidemiology

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a RAPID grant from the National Science Foundation under Award ID BCS-2031097 (RHF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.