Background: Simulation based learning experiences help nurses gain skills necessary for independent practice. However, increased cognitive load placed on learners in simulation may affect learning outcomes.
Objectives: The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize what is known about nurses' cognitive load in simulation and summarize measurement approaches.
Data sources: A search of CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health, and ERIC databases was limited to peer-reviewed studies published after 2006 in the English language, using the key words nurse, simulation, and cognitive load.
Review methods: Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) integrative review method was used. Studies investigating advanced practice nurses or interprofessional teams were excluded.
Results: Database and reference lists searches identified a total of 3077 records, and 20 met inclusion criteria. Simulation fidelity, time pressure, dual-tasking, interruptions, task complexity, distractions, and mismatched simulation objectives to learner ability increase nurses' cognitive load. However, past experience, pre-briefing, repeated scenarios, and worked-out modeling optimize cognitive load. Subjective and objective cognitive load measures help researchers understand cognitive load and define its relationship with other variables.
Conclusions: Simulation impacts nurses' cognitive load. Varying simulation designs to optimize cognitive load will improve learning outcomes. Future nursing simulation research should utilize well-validated cognitive load measures and measure cognitive load alongside other variables to further understand how cognitive load affects simulation outcomes.
Keywords: Cognitive load; Eye tracking; Learning outcome; Nurse; Simulation.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.