Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 13;9(2):380.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020380.

Escherichia coli Isolated from Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Clonal Diversity, Resistance Profile, Virulence Potential, and Genome Adaptation

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Escherichia coli Isolated from Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Clonal Diversity, Resistance Profile, Virulence Potential, and Genome Adaptation

Alexi Lienard et al. Microorganisms. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

This study assessed the clonal diversity, the resistance profile and the virulence potential of Escherichia coli strains isolated from diabetic foot infection (DFI) and diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFOM). A retrospective single-centre study was conducted on patients diagnosed with E. coli isolated from deep DFI and DFOM at Clinique du Pied Diabétique Gard-Occitanie (France) over a two-year period. Phylogenetic backgrounds, virulence factors (VFs) and antibiotic resistance profiles were determined. Whole-genome analysis of E. coli strains isolated from same patients at different periods were performed. From the two-years study period, 35 E. coli strains isolated from 33 patients were analysed; 73% were isolated from DFOM. The majority of the strains belonged to the virulent B2 and D phylogenetic groups (82%). These isolates exhibited a significant higher average of VFs number than strains belonging to other groups (p < 0.001). papG2 gene was significantly more detected in strains belonging to B2 phylogroup isolated from DFI compared to DFOM (p = 0.003). The most prevalent antibiotic resistance pattern was observed for ampicillin (82%), cotrimoxazole (45%), and ciprofloxacin (33%). The genome analysis of strains isolated at two periods in DFOM showed a decrease of the genome size, and this decrease was more important for the strain isolated at nine months (vs. four months). A shared mutation on the putative acyl-CoA dehydrogenase-encoding gene aidB was observed on both strains. E. coli isolates from DFOM were highly genetically diverse with different pathogenicity traits. Their adaptation in the bone structure could require genome reduction and some important modifications in the balance virulence/resistance of the bacteria.

Keywords: Escherichia coli; adaptation; diabetic foot osteomyelitis; resistance; virulome; whole-genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Genetic diversity of Escherichia coli strains isolated from diabetic foot infections using DiversiLab method, Multi-Locus Sequence Typing and phylogrouping. In green, the strains isolated at two periods in a same patient (Patient 1, NECR70/NECR10; Patient 2, NECS50/NECS21).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prediction of pathogenicity islands within Escherichia coli genomes isolated from diabetic foot infections. Pathogenicity islands were predicted using IslandViewer 4, including three predictions methods Integrated, IslandPath-DIMOB, and SIGI-HMM (http://www.pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandviewer (accessed on 28 January 2021)).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Armstrong D.G., Boulton A.J.M., Bus S.A. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:2367–2375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lipsky B.A., Senneville E., Abbas Z.G., Aragón-Sánchez J., Diggle M., Embil J.M., Kono S., Lavery L.A., Malone M., van Asten S.A., et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update) Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2020;36:1–24. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3280. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Senneville E.M., Lipsky B.A., van Asten S.A.V., Peters E.J. Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2020;36:1–4. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3250. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uçkay I., Gariani K., Pataky Z., Lipsky B.A. Diabetic foot infections: State-of-the-art. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2014;16:305–316. doi: 10.1111/dom.12190. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petkovšek Ž., Eleršič K., Gubina M., Žgur-Bertok D., Starčič Erjavec M. Virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolates from skin and soft tissue infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;48:1811–1817. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01421-08. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources