Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- PMID: 33687470
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Abstract
Importance: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in the US. In 2020, an estimated 228 820 persons were diagnosed with lung cancer, and 135 720 persons died of the disease. The most important risk factor for lung cancer is smoking. Increasing age is also a risk factor for lung cancer. Lung cancer has a generally poor prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 20.5%. However, early-stage lung cancer has a better prognosis and is more amenable to treatment.
Objective: To update its 2013 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on the accuracy of screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and on the benefits and harms of screening for lung cancer and commissioned a collaborative modeling study to provide information about the optimum age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal screening interval, and the relative benefits and harms of different screening strategies compared with modified versions of multivariate risk prediction models.
Population: This recommendation statement applies to adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.
Evidence assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT has a moderate net benefit in persons at high risk of lung cancer based on age, total cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke, and years since quitting smoking.
Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. Screening should be discontinued once a person has not smoked for 15 years or develops a health problem that substantially limits life expectancy or the ability or willingness to have curative lung surgery. (B recommendation) This recommendation replaces the 2013 USPSTF statement that recommended annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in adults aged 55 to 80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.
Comment in
-
Broadened Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening: Challenges and Uncertainty for Implementation and Equity.JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):939-941. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26422. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33687453 No abstract available.
-
In high-risk adults aged 50 to 80 y, USPSTF recommends annual lung cancer screening with LDCT (moderate certainty).Ann Intern Med. 2021 Aug;174(8):JC86. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ202108170-086. Epub 2021 Aug 3. Ann Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 34339228
-
The US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Lung Cancer Screening.JAMA. 2021 Aug 3;326(5):440-441. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.8240. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34342624 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Screening for Lung Cancer.JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):1016. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1799. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33687464 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):330-8. doi: 10.7326/M13-2771. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24378917
-
Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):988-997. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1077. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33687469 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Persons: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):265-279. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.25019. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33464343
-
Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A Collaborative Modeling Study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021 Mar. Report No.: 20-05266-EF-2. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021 Mar. Report No.: 20-05266-EF-2. PMID: 33750088 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Lung Cancer Screening.Med Clin North Am. 2017 Jul;101(4):769-785. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.03.008. Med Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28577626 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sensitivity analysis for studies transporting prediction models.Biometrics. 2024 Oct 3;80(4):ujae129. doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae129. Biometrics. 2024. PMID: 39575627
-
Developing a Conceptual Framework for a Person-Centered Approach to Improving Adherence and Outcomes in Lung Cancer Screening: The Engaged Approach to Lung Cancer Screening: A Brief Report.JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 Sep 17;5(12):100728. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100728. eCollection 2024 Dec. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024. PMID: 39564096 Free PMC article.
-
Interpretable machine learning model for digital lung cancer prescreening in Chinese populations with missing data.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 19;7(1):327. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01309-z. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 39562681 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking how mobile units can catalyze progress on lung cancer screening: a scoping review of what we have learned.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):7143-7154. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-846. Epub 2024 Oct 30. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 39552879 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of Interventions Intended to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov 13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09097-8. Online ahead of print. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39538041
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
