Discrepancies between self-rated depression and observed depression severity: The effects of personality and dysfunctional attitudes
- PMID: 33689981
- DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.11.016
Discrepancies between self-rated depression and observed depression severity: The effects of personality and dysfunctional attitudes
Abstract
Background: Patient self-reports and clinician ratings of depression severity can differ substantially. The aim of the current study was to explore factors associated with discrepancies between depressed patients' Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) self-reports and clinicians' Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) ratings.
Methods: We first computed discrepancy scores defined as the standardized weighted HAMD-17 total score minus the standardized PHQ-9 total score. To assess correlates of inconsistent scores, results of patients with similar standardized scores were removed (i.e., within ½ standard deviation, n = 270). Positive values indicate underreporting (HAMD-17 > PHQ-9), i.e., the underreporting group (n = 200); and negative discrepancy scores indicate overreporting (PHQ-9 > HAMD-17), i.e., the overreporting group (n = 221). We examined the relationship of demographic, dysfunctional attitudes and personality variables to the discrepancies between self and observer rated depression.
Results: There were significant differences in extraversion, psychoticism, neuroticism, dysfunctional attitudes and occupation between the underreporting group and the overreporting group (all p < .05). When controlling for potential confounding variables, being a working professional and having high neuroticism and dysfunctional attitudes were significantly associated with overestimating symptoms of depression (e.g., professional: OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.67-5.00; p < .001; high neuroticism: OR, 7.08; 95% CI, 1.47-34.08; p < .001;dysfunctional attitudes: OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; p = .030). People with average, or high extraversion tended to underestimate scores (average extraversion: OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.95; high extraversion: OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.98).
Conclusions: This study is the first to use PHQ-9 and HAMD-17 to explore the discrepancies between self and observer rated depression. Discrepancies occurred between the PHQ-9 score and HAMD-17 score, which were related to neuroticism, extraversion, dysfunctional attitudes and being a working professional. Future research should clarify the relationship between these factors and therapeutic effects of treatments, including adverse outcomes.
Keywords: Depression assessment; Discrepancy; HAMD-17; Observer rating; PHQ-9; Self-rating.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression. The relationship to demographic, clinical and personality variables.J Affect Disord. 2000 Oct;60(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00156-1. J Affect Disord. 2000. PMID: 10940445
-
Relationship of Internet addiction with cognitive style, personality, and depression in university students.Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;55(6):1385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 May 6. Compr Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 24889340
-
Sensitivity to detect change and the correlation of clinical factors with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory in depressed inpatients.Psychiatry Res. 2012 Jun 30;198(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.11.014. Epub 2012 Mar 22. Psychiatry Res. 2012. PMID: 22445070
-
The relationship of demographic, clinical, cognitive and personality variables to the discrepancy between self and clinician rated depression.J Affect Disord. 2010 Jul;124(1-2):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 9. J Affect Disord. 2010. PMID: 20004477
-
Depression rating scales in Parkinson's disease: A critical review updating recent literature.J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 15;184:216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.059. Epub 2015 Jun 10. J Affect Disord. 2015. PMID: 26114228 Review.
Cited by
-
Tissue-Specific Oxysterols as Predictors of Antidepressant (Escitalopram) Treatment Response in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Jan 30;3(4):663-672. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.01.004. eCollection 2023 Oct. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 37881566 Free PMC article.
-
The mediating effects of dysfunctional attitudes and moderating effect of sex between stressful life events and depressive symptoms among Chinese college students.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38103-y. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37407699 Free PMC article.
-
A Cross-Sectional Study: Structural and Related Functional Connectivity Changes in the Brain: Stigmata of Adverse Parenting in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder?Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):694. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040694. Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37190659 Free PMC article.
-
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder.Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 4;12:747139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747139. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34803766 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
