Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep-Oct;11(5):415-423.
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

A Step Toward Making VMAT TBI More Prevalent: Automating the Treatment Planning Process

Affiliations

A Step Toward Making VMAT TBI More Prevalent: Automating the Treatment Planning Process

E Simiele et al. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to automate the treatment planning process for total body irradiation (TBI) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Methods and materials: Two scripts were developed to facilitate autoplanning: the binary plug-in script automating the creation of optimization structures, plan generation, beam placement, and setting of the optimization constraints and the stand-alone executable performing successive optimizations. Ten patients previously treated in our clinic with VMAT TBI were used to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed autoplanning process. Paired t tests were used to compare the dosimetric indices of the produced auto plans to the manually generated clinical plans. In addition, 3 physicians were asked to evaluate the manual and autoplans for each patient in a blinded retrospective review.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the manual and autoplan global Dmax (P < .893), planning target volume V110% (P < .734), kidneys Dmean (P < .351), and bowel Dmax (P < .473). Significant decreases in the Dmean to the lungs and lungs-1cm (ie, lungs with 1-cm inner margin) volumes of 5.4% ± 6.4% (P < .024) and 6.8% ± 7.4% (P < .017), respectively, were obtained with the autoplans compared with the manual plans. The autoplans were selected 77% of the time by the reviewing physicians as equivalent or superior to the manual plans. The required time for treatment planning was estimated to be 2 to 3 days for the manual plans compared with approximately 3 to 5 hours for the autoplans.

Conclusions: Large reductions in planning time without sacrificing plan quality were obtained using the developed autoplanning process compared with manual planning, thus reducing the required effort of the treatment planning team. Superior lung sparing with the same target coverage and similar global Dmax were observed with the autoplans as compared with the manual treatment plans. The developed scripts have been made open-source to improve access to VMAT TBI at other institutions and clinics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources