SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33749159
- PMCID: PMC8120387
- DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13313
SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to determine the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), compare the effect of SGLT2i with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and find whether combination of SGLT2i and ARNI is better than monotherapy.
Methods and results: Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating SGLT2i or ARNI in HFrEF. And a total of six trials were included. SGLT2i was found to significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure by 27% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.80], hospitalization for heart failure by 31% (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.77), cardiovascular death by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95), and all-cause death by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94) in HFrEF only with a statistically higher risk of genital infection (risk ratio (RR) 2.78, 95% CI 1.46-5.29). The reduction in cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure was of similar magnitude in patients with or without diabetes mellitus (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.80 vs. HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.87) using SGLT2i. Indirect treatment comparison showed that SGLT2i and ARNI had similar effects on primary outcome (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.06). And combination of SGLT2i and ARNI achieved a better prognosis performance (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.89) compared with ARNI monotherapy.
Conclusions: SGLT2i could safely reduce cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in HFrEF regardless of diabetes mellitus status. SGLT2i and ARNI demonstrate similar effects, while combination of SGLT2i and ARNI results in a better cardiovascular protective effect.
Keywords: Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor; Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; Meta-analysis; Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.
© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Yuling Yan, Bin Liu, Jun Du, Jing Wang, Xiaodong Jing, Yajie Liu, Songbai Deng, Jianlin Du, and Qiang She declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Cardiol. 2023 Oct;46(10):1137-1145. doi: 10.1002/clc.24085. Epub 2023 Jul 19. Clin Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37465885 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors First Strategy Improve Decongestion in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction When Compared to Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor First Strategy.Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2023 Apr 27;28(4):81. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2804081. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2023. PMID: 37114551
-
A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;10(2):73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Dec 8. JACC Heart Fail. 2022. PMID: 34895860
-
Pharmacological Treatments in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug 25:S2213-1779(23)00410-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.07.014. Online ahead of print. JACC Heart Fail. 2023. PMID: 37656079
-
Effectiveness and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023 Feb 1;24(2):123-131. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001426. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023. PMID: 36583980 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Outcomes Between Sacubitril/Valsartan and Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Nov 10;15(11):e48623. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48623. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38084196 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stem Cell-Based Therapy and Cell-Free Therapy as an Alternative Approach for Cardiac Regeneration.Stem Cells Int. 2023 Nov 2;2023:2729377. doi: 10.1155/2023/2729377. eCollection 2023. Stem Cells Int. 2023. PMID: 37954462 Free PMC article. Review.
-
SGLT2i‑treated heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction: A meta‑analysis.Exp Ther Med. 2023 Oct 10;26(6):548. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12248. eCollection 2023 Dec. Exp Ther Med. 2023. PMID: 37928504 Free PMC article.
-
SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA therapy in type 1 diabetes and reno-vascular outcomes: a real-world study.Diabetologia. 2023 Oct;66(10):1869-1881. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-05975-8. Epub 2023 Jul 28. Diabetologia. 2023. PMID: 37505282 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Cardiol. 2023 Oct;46(10):1137-1145. doi: 10.1002/clc.24085. Epub 2023 Jul 19. Clin Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37465885 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lee HY, Baek SH. Optimal use of beta‐blockers for congestive heart failure. Circ J 2016; 80: 565–571. - PubMed
-
- Nochioka K, Sakata Y, Shimokawa H. Combination therapy of renin angiotensin system inhibitors and β‐blockers in patients with heart failure. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018; 1067: 17–30. - PubMed
-
- Chia N, Fulcher J, Keech A. Beta‐blocker, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, nitrate‐hydralazine, diuretics, aldosterone antagonist, ivabradine, devices and digoxin (BANDAID2): an evidence‐based mnemonic for the treatment of systolic heart failure. Intern Med J 2016; 46: 653–662. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
