Coronary revascularization outcomes in relation to skilled nursing facility use following hospital discharge
- PMID: 33755210
- PMCID: PMC8119835
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.23583
Coronary revascularization outcomes in relation to skilled nursing facility use following hospital discharge
Abstract
Background: Observational analyses comparing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among elderly or frail patients are likely biased by treatment selection. PCI is typically chosen for frail patients, while CABG is more common for patients with good recovery potential.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized that skilled nursing facility (SNF) use after revascularization is a measure of relative frailty associated with outcomes following coronary revascularization.
Methods: We used a 20 percent sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who received inpatient PCI or CABG between 2007-2014. Key explanatory variables were the revascularization strategy and SNF use after revascularization. We used Cox regression to evaluate death and repeat revascularization within one year and logistic regression to evaluate SNF use and 30-day readmissions/death.
Results: CABG patients were 25.1 percentage points [95% confidence interval: 24.7, 25.5] more likely to use SNF following revascularization than inpatient PCI patients. SNF use was associated with a higher death rate (hazard ratio (HR): 3.19 [3.02, 3.37]) and a 16.2 percentage point (15.5, 16.9) increase in 30-day readmissions/death. Among patients with SNF use, CABG was associated with a decrease in 30-day readmissions/death compared to PCI.
Conclusions: While CABG was associated with higher rates of SNF use and 30-day readmission/death overall, CABG was associated with significantly lower rates of 30-day readmissions/death among patients with SNF use. The findings suggest that caution is needed in treatment selection for patients at high-risk for SNF use and that selection of inpatient PCI over CABG may be associated with frailty and worse outcomes for some patients.
Keywords: coronary artery bypass graft; medicare; percutaneous coronary intervention; post-acute care.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Rating and Surgical Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Autumn;36(3):313-320. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 36402230
-
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30025574
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Therapy, Percutaneous Revascularization, and Surgical Coronary Revascularization in Cardiovascular Risk Subgroups of Patients With CKD: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Oct;74(4):463-473. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Jun 27. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019. PMID: 31255335
-
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24240936 Review.
-
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18. Am Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28760214 Review.
Cited by
-
The correlation between COVID-19 vaccination and cardiac surgery: When is safe to vaccinate?J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3639-3641. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16887. Epub 2022 Sep 2. J Card Surg. 2022. PMID: 36054408 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Rossi J, Stearns S, Vavalle J, Caranasos T, Flaherty J. Tct‐247 discharge status following coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention from the national inpatient sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:B101.
-
- Secco GG, Marinucci L, Uguccioni L, Parisi R, Uguccioni S, Fattori R. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary interventions in elderly patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25:254‐256. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
