COVID-19 Response Strategies at Large Institutes of Higher Education in the United States: A Landscape Analysis, Fall 2020

J Adolesc Health. 2021 Apr;68(4):683-685. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.016.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the pandemic response plans of institutes of higher education (i.e., colleges and universities), including COVID-19 prevention, enforcement, and testing strategies.

Method: Data from the largest public (n = 50) and private (n = 50) US institutes of higher education were collected from October 30 to November 20, 2020.

Results: Most institutes of higher education (n = 93) offered some in-person teaching in the Fall 2020 semester; most adopted masking (100%) and physical distancing (99%) mandates. Other preventive strategies included on-campus housing de-densification (58%), classroom de-densification (61%), mandated COVID-19-related training (39%), and behavioral compacts (43%). Testing strategies included entry testing (65%), testing at regular intervals (32%), population sample testing (46%), and exit testing (15%). More private than public institutes implemented intercollegiate athletics bans, behavioral compacts, and suspension clauses for noncompliance.

Conclusions: Variability in COVID-19 prevention and testing strategies highlights the need for national recommendations and the equitable distribution of sufficient pandemic response resources to institutes of higher education.

Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 testing; College; Health policy; IHEs; Institutes of higher education; Pandemic response; Public health; Universities; Young adult.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19 / prevention & control*
  • COVID-19 Testing
  • Communicable Disease Control / methods*
  • Humans
  • Masks
  • Pandemics
  • Physical Distancing
  • Sports
  • United States
  • Universities*