Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 30:10:e63518.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.63518.

Group phenotypic composition in cancer

Affiliations
Review

Group phenotypic composition in cancer

Jean-Pascal Capp et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Although individual cancer cells are generally considered the Darwinian units of selection in malignant populations, they frequently act as members of groups where fitness of the group cannot be reduced to the average fitness of individual group members. A growing body of studies reveals limitations of reductionist approaches to explaining biological and clinical observations. For example, induction of angiogenesis, inhibition of the immune system, and niche engineering through environmental acidification and/or remodeling of extracellular matrix cannot be achieved by single tumor cells and require collective actions of groups of cells. Success or failure of such group activities depends on the phenotypic makeup of the individual group members. Conversely, these group activities affect the fitness of individual members of the group, ultimately affecting the composition of the group. This phenomenon, where phenotypic makeup of individual group members impacts the fitness of both members and groups, has been captured in the term 'group phenotypic composition' (GPC). We provide examples where considerations of GPC could help in understanding the evolution and clinical progression of cancers and argue that use of the GPC framework can facilitate new insights into cancer biology and assist with the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: cancer biology; ecology; evolutionary biology; medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JC, JD, AN, AD, JB, PP, CA, RH, BR, BU, AM, RG, FT No competing interests declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. GPC and its ecological/evolutionary implications.
Because individuals show significant phenotypic variation (I), groups may vary in their GPC depending on which individuals constitute the group (II). This may in return influence group-level outcomes (III), which as a consequence differentially impacts individual fitness (IV). (V) GPC then drives different evolutionary responses, like for instance decisions to join or leave particular groups or phenotypic plasticity in response to GPC. These phenomena can then influence the distribution of phenotypes in subsequent generations (figure modified from Farine et al., 2015).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. The tumoral GPC framework.
Cancer cell proliferation and mutation in a tumor can produce different possibilities of tumoral GPCs, depending on the relative fitness of cancer cells at a given time (different colored cells represent distinct evolutionary lineages). Depending on the resulting tumoral GPC, the tumor, viewed as the habitat in which malignant cells live and evolve, possesses specific group properties (e.g., quality of the vascular network, level of immunogenicity, etc.). These properties can, in return, affect (positively or negatively) cell fitness, and hence tumor growth. In the absence of selection at the group level, or of an encoded tumorigenesis program, it is potentially frequent that conditions that increase cell-level fitness of one clonal lineage can result in a non-optimal or even detrimental tumoral GPCs, which can slow down or stop tumor growth, and/or even induce its size reduction. Since tumors of different sizes have different requirements and interactions with their changing microenvironment, tumoral GPC varies with the tumor stages and the microenvironment; that is, there is no single optimal tumoral GPC that is maintained throughout cancer progression. Only tumors that achieve a successful/adequate tumoral GPC at each step of tumorigenesis will evolve into metastatic tumors. The tumors that fail to generate an adequate tumoral GPC at a given step do not necessarily disappear, they just do not continue to expand. Those that produce an inadequate tumoral GPC, for instance leading to higher immunogenicity, may become reduced in size and even disappear. This hypothesis can explain why we can develop many neoplasms in the body, but the majority of them never grow until the metastatic stage or even regress (Folkman and Kalluri, 2004). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), especially clusters that can be either homogeneous (organ 3) or heterogeneous (organ 2), can disseminate and initiate metastasis where a novel process of diversification is required so as to harbor the right GPC in a given organ and develop into advanced metastasis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aceto N, Bardia A, Miyamoto DT, Donaldson MC, Wittner BS, Spencer JA, Yu M, Pely A, Engstrom A, Zhu H, Brannigan BW, Kapur R, Stott SL, Shioda T, Ramaswamy S, Ting DT, Lin CP, Toner M, Haber DA, Maheswaran S. Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast Cancer metastasis. Cell. 2014;158:1110–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antoniou AC, Easton DF. Models of genetic susceptibility to breast Cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:5898–5905. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209879. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Axelrod R, Axelrod DE, Pienta KJ. Evolution of cooperation among tumor cells. PNAS. 2006;103:13474–13479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606053103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck B, Blanpain C. Unravelling Cancer stem cell potential. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2013;13:727–738. doi: 10.1038/nrc3597. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bertolaso M, Dieli AM. Cancer and intercellular cooperation. Royal Society Open Science. 2017;4:170470. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170470. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources