Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis
- PMID: 3379579
- DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.768
Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis
Abstract
We investigated the hypothesis that people's facial activity influences their affective responses. Two studies were designed to both eliminate methodological problems of earlier experiments and clarify theoretical ambiguities. This was achieved by having subjects hold a pen in their mouth in ways that either inhibited or facilitated the muscles typically associated with smiling without requiring subjects to pose in a smiling face. Study 1's results demonstrated the effectiveness of the procedure. Subjects reported more intense humor responses when cartoons were presented under facilitating conditions than under inhibiting conditions that precluded labeling of the facial expression in emotion categories. Study 2 served to further validate the methodology and to answer additional theoretical questions. The results replicated Study 1's findings and also showed that facial feedback operates on the affective but not on the cognitive component of the humor response. Finally, the results suggested that both inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms may have contributed to the observed affective responses.
Similar articles
-
Facilitating the Furrowed Brow: An Unobtrusive Test of the Facial Feedback Hypothesis Applied to Unpleasant Affect.Cogn Emot. 1992 Sep;6(5):321-338. doi: 10.1080/02699939208409689. Cogn Emot. 1992. PMID: 29022461
-
Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988).Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov;11(6):917-928. doi: 10.1177/1745691616674458. Epub 2016 Oct 26. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27784749
-
Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: a test of the facial feedback hypothesis.Emotion. 2002 Mar;2(1):52-74. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.52. Emotion. 2002. PMID: 12899366 Clinical Trial.
-
Facial expressions of emotion: an old controversy and new findings.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):63-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0008. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992. PMID: 1348139 Review.
-
[The facial expression says more than words. Is emotional "contagion" via facial expression the first step toward empathy?].Lakartidningen. 2002 Mar 27;99(13):1438-42. Lakartidningen. 2002. PMID: 11989352 Review. Swedish.
Cited by
-
A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration.Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Oct 20. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01458-9. Online ahead of print. Nat Hum Behav. 2022. PMID: 36266452
-
Restricting movements of lower face leaves recognition of emotional vocalizations intact but introduces a valence positivity bias.Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 27;12(1):16101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18888-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36167865 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for the embodiment of the automatic approach bias.Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 9;13:797122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.797122. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36160565 Free PMC article.
-
Pilot study of facial and bodily feedback.Neuropsychiatr. 2022 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s40211-022-00426-z. Online ahead of print. Neuropsychiatr. 2022. PMID: 36018476 English.
-
Neuronal effects of glabellar botulinum toxin injections using a valenced inhibition task in borderline personality disorder.Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 20;12(1):14197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17509-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35987909 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
