Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 19:11:654086.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654086. eCollection 2021.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients and Staff in Radiation Oncology Departments in Belgium: A National Survey

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients and Staff in Radiation Oncology Departments in Belgium: A National Survey

Aude Vaandering et al. Front Oncol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Purpose: COVID-19 reached Belgium in February and quickly became a major public health challenge. It is of importance to evaluate the actual impact of COVID-19 on patients and staff in Belgian radiotherapy departments (RTDs). This was evaluated through a weekly national survey sent to departments measuring key factors that were affected by the pandemic. Materials and Methods: The Belgian SocieTy for Radiation Oncology (BeSTRO) together with the Belgian College for physicians in Radiation Oncology invited all 26 RTD to participate in a survey that started on March 2nd and was re- submitted weekly for 4 months to assess variations in time. The survey focused on: (1) the COVID-19 status of patients and staff; (2) the management of clinically suspected COVID patients and COVID positive patients; (3) the impact of COVID-19 on RTD activities; (4) its impact in radiotherapy indications and fractionation schemes. Results: Seventy-three percent of 26 RTDs completed the first survey and 57% responded to all weekly surveys. In the RTD staff, 24 members were COVID-positive of whom 67% were RTTs. Over the study period, the number of patients treated dropped by a maximum of 18.8% when compared to March 2nd. In 32.3% of COVID-positive and 54% of COVID suspected patients, treatment was continued without any interruptions. Radiotherapy indications were adapted within the 1st weeks of the survey in 47.4% of RTD, especially for urological and breast tumors. Fractionation schemes were changed in 68.4% of RTD, mainly for urological, breast, gastro-intestinal, and lung tumors. Conclusions: Between March and June 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an important decrease in treatment activity in RTD in Belgium (18.8%). The COVID-19 infection status of patients influenced the continuity of the radiotherapy schedule. Changes in indications and fractionation schedules of radiotherapy were rapidly incorporated in the different RTD.

Keywords: COVID-19; national survey; pandemic; radiation oncology; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative number of RTD staff members tested and number of staff tested positive for COVID-19: for (A) Radiation Oncologists (RO); (B) Medical Physics Experts (MPE) and Medical Physics Assistants (MPA); (C) Radiation therapists (RTTs) and (D) Administrative staff.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variations in the total number of treatments between March 9th and June 26th (assuming that the week of March 2nd is a week where there was a 100% activity level).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variations in the number of curative and palliative treatments over the studied period as compared to the week of March 2nd.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean number of treatment starts per department per pathology over time.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Treatment management for COVID suspected patients. (B) Treatment management for COVID positive patients.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Percentage of departments having changed their radiotherapy indication per pathology. (B) Percentage of departments having changed their radiotherapy fractionation schemes per pathology.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO . Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. World Health Organization. (2019). Available online at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situatio... (accessed October 26, 2020).
    1. Guckenberger M, Belka C, Bezjak A, Bradley J, Daly ME, DeRuysscher D, et al. . Practice recommendations for lung cancer radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESTRO-ASTRO consensus statement. Radiother Oncol. (2020) 146:223–9. 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noticewala SS, Ludmir EB, Bishop AJ, Chung C, Ghia AJ, Grosshans D, et al. . Radiation for glioblastoma in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): patient selection and hypofractionation to maximize benefit and minimize risk. Adv Radiat Oncol. (2020) 5:743–5. 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.040 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson DJ, Palma D, Guckenberger M, Balermpas P, Beitler JJ, Blanchard P, et al. . Practice recommendations for risk-adapted head and neck cancer radiation therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ASTRO-ESTRO consensus statement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2020) 107:618–27. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.016 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu S, Zheng D, Liu Y, Hu D, Wei W, Han G. Radiation therapy care during a major outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan. Adv Radiat Oncol. (2020) 5:531–3. 10.1016/j.adro.2020.03.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources