A candidate biomarker of glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF and blood in differentiating multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33819724
- DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102870
A candidate biomarker of glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF and blood in differentiating multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a monomeric intermediate filament protein. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed regarding a candidate biomarker for astrocytic damage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood GFAP levels in differentiating multiple sclerosis and its subtypes.
Methods: Relevant studies published prior to October 2020 were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov databases using the following keywords: 'Multiple sclerosis' or 'MS' and 'Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein' or 'GFAP'. Two authors independently selected the articles and extracted the data. Of the 31 full articles screened, 11 were included in the qualitative analysis and meta-analysis. Differences in the mean CSF and blood GFAP levels were used as the main efficacy measures, and the meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3 software.
Results: Eleven clinical trials comprising 960 patients were selected. CSF GFAP levels were higher in 503 MS patients than in 252 (healthy and disease) controls, with a moderate effect size of 0.72 (p < 0.00001). Mean CSF GFAP levels were significantly higher in 325 MS patients with relapsing disease than in 140 MS patients with progressive disease (SMD=-0.47; 95% CI=-0.80 to -0.15; P = 0.005). CSF GFAP levels in 161 MS patients in relapse (irrespective of MS subtype) were significantly higher than those in 180 MS patients in remission (MD=103.83; 95% CI=68.09 to139.57; P<0.001). The performances of GFAP in blood for differentiating patients with MS from controls were also significant. Blood GFAP was higher in 245 MS patients than in 53 (healthy and disease) controls, with a moderate effect size of 37.25 (p < 0.00001).
Conclusion: The level of CSF-GFAP is correlated with MS and its different subtypes, reflecting the different degrees of damage to astrocytes in different subtypes of MS. In addition, progressive MS is more closely related to the increase in cerebrospinal fluid GFAP level than relapsing-remitting MS, and GFAP may be a useful marker of disease progression. Moreover, the GFAP level in the blood of MS patients is higher than that in the control group, and the sample size needs to be further expanded for verification in the future..
Keywords: Glial fibrillary acidic protein; Meta-analysis; Multiple sclerosis; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Role of Chitinase 3-like 1 as a Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022 May 9;9(4):e1164. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001164. Print 2022 Jul. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022. PMID: 35534236 Free PMC article.
-
Glial and neuroaxonal biomarkers in a multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort.Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Sep-Dec;22 Suppl 2:113-121. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 31802051
-
Glial fibrillary acidic protein: a potential biomarker for progression in multiple sclerosis.J Neurol. 2011 May;258(5):882-8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5863-2. Epub 2011 Jan 1. J Neurol. 2011. PMID: 21197541
-
Prediction of clinical progression in nervous system diseases: plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 12;29(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01631-4. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38216970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review and integrated analysis with glial fibrillary acidic protein.Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar;45(3):1255-1261. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07277-8. Epub 2023 Dec 23. Neurol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38141119 Review.
Cited by
-
How Early Is Early Multiple Sclerosis?J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 29;13(1):214. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010214. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202221 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Comparison of the Selected Parameters of Brain Injury and Interleukins in the CSF in Patients Diagnosed De Novo with RRMS Compared to the Control Group.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 13;13(22):3436. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223436. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37998571 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Shared Genetic Signatures of Alzheimer's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis: A Bioinformatic Analysis Study.Eur Neurol. 2023;86(6):363-376. doi: 10.1159/000533397. Epub 2023 Oct 17. Eur Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37848007 Free PMC article.
-
Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory biomarkers for disease progression in Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.Front Immunol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1162340. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1162340. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37520580 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Protein biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.Encephalitis. 2023 Apr;3(2):54-63. doi: 10.47936/encephalitis.2022.00101. Epub 2023 Apr 4. Encephalitis. 2023. PMID: 37469674 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
