Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 25:11:629132.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.629132. eCollection 2021.

Efficacy of Herbal Medicines Intervention for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Gastrointestinal Toxicity - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Efficacy of Herbal Medicines Intervention for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Gastrointestinal Toxicity - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuanyuan Chen et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal (CIGI) toxicity affects the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and the clinical application of treatment drugs. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of traditional herbal medicines (HMs) in alleviating symptoms of CIGI toxicity (including nausea and vomiting, anorexia, diarrhea, constipation, oral mucositis, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension), and to explore further individual herb or herbal combinations in alleviating the CIGI toxicity. Methods: Nine electronic databases were screened from 2010 to 2020. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials with a total of 1,995 patients evaluating the complementary efficacy of HMs with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy-alone were included. Further, sensitivity analyses of orally administered multi-ingredient HM interventions were explored based on the composition of HM interventions. Results: The meta-analysis showed that HM treatment combined with chemotherapy significantly alleviated the overall CIGI toxicity (RR = 0.78 [0.72, 0.84], p < 0.001, I 2 = 44%), nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.74 [0.66, 0.82], p < 0.001, I 2 = 35%), diarrhea (P = 0.02, RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44-0.93, I 2 = 50%), oral mucositis (RR = 0.65 [0.48, 0.88], P = 0.005, I 2 = 24%), and abdominal distension (RR = 0.36 [0.18, 0.73], P = 0.004, I 2 = 0%). However, no statistically significant effects of HMs were shown in studies with a double-blind design for CIGI toxicity. Based on the ingredients of the HMs, further sensitivity analyses identified five herbs [Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch., Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz., Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge., Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf., and the pericarp of Citrus reticulata Blanco.] that were associated with significant reductions in CIGI toxicity. Conclusion: A statistically significant effect of HMs combined with chemotherapy on alleviating the overall CIGI toxicity, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, oral mucositis, or abdominal distension is only shown in studies without a double-blind design. Further well-designed, double-blinded, large-scaled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted to comprehensively evaluate the treatment efficacy. Further clinical research that includes the five herbs with chemotherapy for patients, the safety of the combinations of these herbs, and the potential synergistic effects of these combinations of herbs should be conducted.

Keywords: chemotherapy induced anorexia; chemotherapy induced diarrhea; chemotherapy induced gastrointestinal toxicity; chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting; colorecal cancer; gastrointestinal toxicity; herbal medicine; traditional medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flowchart based on PRISMA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The overall risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias assessment by individual trials.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall effect of herbal medicine on chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity reported as risk ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot indicated potential publication bias.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Overall effect of herbal medicine on chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity reported as mean difference.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Sub-analysis on the effect of herbal medicine in nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Sub-analysis on the effect of herbal medicine in diarrhea in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Sub-analysis on the effect of herbal medicine in anorexia in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Sub-analysis on the effect of herbal medicine in oral mucositis in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Sub-analysis on the effect of herbal medicine in constipation in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Sub-analysis on the effect of herbal medicine in abdominal pain in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Sub-analysis on the effect of herbal medicine in abdominal distension in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. (2020) 70:7–30. 10.3322/caac.21590 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pfeiffer P, Köhne CH, Qvortrup C. The changing face of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. (2019) 19:61–70. 10.1080/14737140.2019.1543593 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, et al. . ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. (2012) 23:2479–516. 10.1093/annonc/mds236 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Coller JK. What are the predictive factors in the risk and severity of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity? Future Oncol. (2015) 11:2367–70. 10.2217/fon.15.138 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mocellin S, Baretta Z, Roqué IFM, Solà I, Martin-Richard M, Hallum S, et al. . Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev. (2017) 1:Cd006875. 10.1002/14651858.CD006875.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources