People's Willingness to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 Despite Their Safety Concerns: Twitter Poll Analysis
- PMID: 33872185
- PMCID: PMC8086789
- DOI: 10.2196/28973
People's Willingness to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 Despite Their Safety Concerns: Twitter Poll Analysis
Abstract
Background: On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization's Emergency Committee declared the rapid, worldwide spread of COVID-19 a global health emergency. Since then, tireless efforts have been made to mitigate the spread of the disease and its impact, and these efforts have mostly relied on nonpharmaceutical interventions. By December 2020, the safety and efficacy of the first COVID-19 vaccines were demonstrated. The large social media platform Twitter has been used by medical researchers for the analysis of important public health topics, such as the public's perception on antibiotic use and misuse and human papillomavirus vaccination. The analysis of Twitter-generated data can be further facilitated by using Twitter's built-in, anonymous polling tool to gain insight into public health issues and obtain rapid feedback on an international scale. During the fast-paced course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Twitter polling system has provided a viable method for gaining rapid, large-scale, international public health insights on highly relevant and timely SARS-CoV-2-related topics.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the public's perception on the safety and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in real time by using Twitter polls.
Methods: We developed 2 Twitter polls to explore the public's views on available COVID-19 vaccines. The surveys were pinned to the Digital Health and Patient Safety Platform Twitter timeline for 1 week in mid-February 2021, and Twitter users and influencers were asked to participate in and retweet the polls to reach the largest possible audience.
Results: The adequacy of COVID-19 vaccine safety (ie, the safety of currently available vaccines; poll 1) was agreed upon by 1579 out of 3439 (45.9%) Twitter users. In contrast, almost as many Twitter users (1434/3439, 41.7%) were unsure about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Only 5.2% (179/3439) of Twitter users rated the available COVID-19 vaccines as generally unsafe. Poll 2, which addressed the question of whether users would undergo vaccination, was answered affirmatively by 82.8% (2862/3457) of Twitter users, and only 8% (277/3457) categorically rejected vaccination at the time of polling.
Conclusions: In contrast to the perceived high level of uncertainty about the safety of the available COVID-19 vaccines, we observed an elevated willingness to undergo vaccination among our study sample. Since people's perceptions and views are strongly influenced by social media, the snapshots provided by these media platforms represent a static image of a moving target. Thus, the results of this study need to be followed up by long-term surveys to maintain their validity. This is especially relevant due to the circumstances of the fast-paced pandemic and the need to not miss sudden rises in the incidence of vaccine hesitancy, which may have detrimental effects on the pandemic's course.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Twitter; concern; coronavirus; hesitancy; opinion; perception; public health; safety; social media; survey; vaccination; vaccination hesitancy; vaccination willingness; vaccine; vaccine confidence; willingness.
©Fabian Eibensteiner, Valentin Ritschl, Faisal A Nawaz, Sajjad S Fazel, Christos Tsagkaris, Stefan Tino Kulnik, Rik Crutzen, Elisabeth Klager, Sabine Völkl-Kernstock, Eva Schaden, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Harald Willschke, Atanas G Atanasov. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 29.04.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Mandatory Vaccination Against COVID-19: Twitter Poll Analysis on Public Health Opinion.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):e35754. doi: 10.2196/35754. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35617671 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 29;23(6):e24435. doi: 10.2196/24435. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34115608 Free PMC article.
-
Twitter sentiment analysis from Iran about COVID 19 vaccine.Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Jan;16(1):102367. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102367. Epub 2021 Dec 13. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022. PMID: 34933273 Free PMC article.
-
Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e37367. doi: 10.2196/37367. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35816685 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19 vaccines: concerns beyond protective efficacy and safety.Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021 Aug;20(8):1013-1025. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1949293. Epub 2021 Jul 5. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021. PMID: 34180347 Review.
Cited by
-
Linking Opinions Shared on Social Media About COVID-19 Public Health Measures to Adherence: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys of Twitter Use in Canada.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 13;26:e51325. doi: 10.2196/51325. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39137009 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, attitude, and perception towards COVID-19 vaccinations among the adults in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 17;24(1):1919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19082-9. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39020329 Free PMC article.
-
Patient safety discourse in a pandemic: a Twitter hashtag analysis study on #PatientSafety.Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;11:1268730. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268730. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38035302 Free PMC article.
-
The Correlation Among COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, the Ability to Detect Fake News, and e-Health Literacy.Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Jul;7(3):e130-e138. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230621-01. Epub 2023 Jul 7. Health Lit Res Pract. 2023. PMID: 37463291 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Attitudes toward Vaccination: Representative Study of Polish Society.Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jun 6;11(6):1069. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11061069. Vaccines (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37376458 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931–934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32164834 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ, COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973–1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eibensteiner F, Ritschl V, Stamm T, Cetin A, Schmitt CP, Ariceta G, Bakkaloglu S, Jankauskiene A, Klaus G, Paglialonga F, Edefonti A, Ranchin B, Shroff R, Stefanidis CJ, Vandewalle J, Verrina E, Vondrak K, Zurowska A, Alper SL, Aufricht C. Countermeasures against COVID-19: how to navigate medical practice through a nascent, evolving evidence base - a European multicentre mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 17;11(2):e043015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043015. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=33597140 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
