Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jul;26(7):e1133-e1142.
doi: 10.1002/onco.13804. Epub 2021 May 13.

Effectiveness of Alpelisib + Fulvestrant Compared with Real-World Standard Treatment Among Patients with HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-Mutated Breast Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of Alpelisib + Fulvestrant Compared with Real-World Standard Treatment Among Patients with HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-Mutated Breast Cancer

Stuart Turner et al. Oncologist. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The BYLieve trial (NCT03056755) confirmed efficacy and safety of alpelisib with fulvestrant for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-), PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC), after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as immediate prior therapy. Further analyses were performed to compare efficacy from BYLieve with effectiveness of standard treatment in the real-world setting.

Materials and methods: Patients who progressed on a CDK4/6i plus AI and were treated with alpelisib with fulvestrant in BYLieve were matched with a real-world patient cohort who received standard-of-care from a deidentified clinico-genomics database (CGDB). Primary and secondary endpoints were to compare progression-free survival (PFS), estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the proportion of patients remaining progression-free at 6 months, respectively, between the two cohorts.

Results: A total of 855 patients with PIK3CA-mutant disease who had prior CDK4/6i plus hormone therapy were selected from the CGDB; further matching to 120 patients from BYLieve selected 95 patients without exposure to HER2-targeting agents, clinical study drug, or alpelisib. In unadjusted and postmatching results, primary and secondary endpoints favored treatment with alpelisib with fulvestrant in BYLieve more than standard treatments in the real-world cohort. Postadjustment, median PFS for patients treated with alpelisib in BYLieve was 7.3 versus 3.7 months in the real-world cohort, and 6-month PFS was 54.6% versus 40.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Matched/weighted analysis comparing BYLieve with the real-world setting further supports the clinical benefit of alpelisib with fulvestrant for treatment of HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-mutant ABC after CDK4/6i treatment.

Implications for practice: Approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) have PIK3CA-mutated tumors, which have been associated with endocrine therapy resistance. Alpelisib, an α-selective phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitor, demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival in SOLAR-1 and demonstrated clinical efficacy in BYLieve when combined with fulvestrant. Data are limited in comparing the efficacy of alpelisib combined with fulvestrant with effectiveness of standard therapy after CDK4/6i treatment. Using real-world data, this is the first analysis comparing alpelisib combined with fulvestrant with standard treatments for HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-mutant ABC in the post-CDK4/6i setting.

Keywords: Advanced breast cancer; Alpelisib; Endocrine therapy; PIK3CA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Most common components of post‐CDK4/6i treatments in real‐world cohort (n = 95). aCDK4/6i‐based treatments given after disease progression may be due to a CDK4/6i rechallenge. Abbreviations: CDK4/6i, cyclin‐dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan‐Meier analysis of PFS versus rwPFS: BYLieve versus real‐world cohort with standard treatment post‐CDK4/6i. (A): Preweighted PFS and rwPFS. (B): PFS and rwPFS, postweighting by odds. (C): PFS and rwPFS, post‐greedy nearest neighbor matching. (D): PFS and rwPFS, post‐exact matching. Abbreviations: CDK4/6i, cyclin‐dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor; PFS, progression‐free survival; rwPFS, real‐world PFS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. André F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA‐mutated, hormone receptor‐positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1929–1940. - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju055. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A et al. 4th ESO‐ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC4). Ann Oncol 2018;29:1634–1657. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology ‐ Breast Cancer; Version 4.2020. Plymouth Meeting, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2020.
    1. Rugo HS, Rumble RB, Macrae E et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor‐positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:3069–3103. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms