Limited data are available on the diagnostic utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in early-stage thyroid cancers for BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and TERT promoter mutations, which are known detectable markers for thyroid cancers. Here, we analyzed the above driver mutations in ctDNA and matched neoplastic tissues from patients with early-stage thyroid cancers in order to investigate diagnostic utility of circulating markers in distinguishing from other mimicking thyroid lesions and healthy individuals. In total, 73 matched neoplastic tissue and plasma samples [thyroid cancers (n = 62), benign thyroid disorders (n = 8), and parathyroid lesions (n = 3)] and 54 plasma samples from healthy individuals (as controls) were analyzed for BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and TERT promoter mutations using peptide nucleic acid clamp real-time PCR. Although only one patient with an indeterminate lesion on thyroid cytology showed KRAS mutation (codon 146) in the preoperative plasma, that KRAS mutation was not identified in the stage I papillary thyroid carcinoma tissue. In the remaining 72 plasma samples, no other mutations were identified in BRAF, NRAS, and TERT promoter genes. The concordance rates of mutational results between the plasma and tumor tissue or metastatic lymph node were very low. One (1.9%) of the 54 healthy individuals harbored a KRAS mutation in the plasma samples. The ctDNA results did not represent the mutational profile of primary or metastatic thyroid cancers, warranting a caution for interpretation. The clinical utility of BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and TERT promoter mutation analysis on ctDNA appears to be limited to early-stage thyroid cancers.
Keywords: circulating tumor DNA; clinical diagnosis; mutation; thyroid cancer.