Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 11;11(4):1089.
doi: 10.3390/ani11041089.

Humane Slaughter of Edible Decapod Crustaceans

Affiliations
Review

Humane Slaughter of Edible Decapod Crustaceans

Francesca Conte et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Vast numbers of crustaceans are produced by aquaculture and caught in fisheries to meet the increasing demand for seafood and freshwater crustaceans. Simultaneously, the public is increasingly concerned about current methods employed in their handling and killing. Recent evidence has shown that decapod crustaceans probably have the capacity to suffer because they show responses consistent with pain and have a relatively complex cognitive capacity. For these reasons, they should receive protection. Despite the large numbers of crustaceans transported and slaughtered, legislation protecting their welfare, by using agreed, standardized methods, is lacking. We review various stunning and killing systems proposed for crustaceans, and assess welfare concerns. We suggest the use of methods least likely to cause suffering and call for the implementation of welfare guidelines covering the slaughter of these economically important animals.

Keywords: Decapoda; legislation; slaughtering techniques; stunning; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Elwood R.W. Evidence for pain in decapod crustaceans. Anim. Welf. 2012;21:23–27. doi: 10.7120/096272812X13353700593365. - DOI
    1. Sherwin C.M. Can invertebrates suffer? Or how robust is argument-by-analogy? Anim. Welf. 2001;10:S103–S108.
    1. Broom D.M. Considering animals’ feelings. [(accessed on 7 April 2021)];Anim. Sentience. 2016 5:1–11. doi: 10.51291/2377-7478.1015. Available online: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?artic.... - DOI
    1. Elwood R.W. Discrimination between nociceptive reflexes and more complex responses consistent with pain in crustaceans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2019;11:374. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0368. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diggles B.K. Review of some scientific issues related to crustacean welfare. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2019;76:66–81. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsy058. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources