Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
- PMID: 33937520
- PMCID: PMC8081471
- DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001140
Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
Abstract
Background: For liver transplant candidates on the waiting list, deciding to accept a donor organ with known or potential risk factors can be stressful and can lead to declined offers. Current education for patients and family often takes place during transplant evaluations and can be overwhelming and result in low retention and poor understanding of donor quality.
Methods: In the first phase, we sought to understand provider experiences when counseling patients about donor risks and donor offers. We conducted interviews and focus groups with liver transplant providers at 1 local center and at a national clinician conference. Twenty providers participated: 15 hepatologists and 5 surgeons. The provider feedback was used to create an initial outline of content that is consistent with decision support frameworks. In a second phase, graphic design collaborators created mockups of a patient-friendly tool. We reviewed mockups with 4 transplant coordinators and 9 liver transplant candidates for feedback on clarity and utility to prepare for an organ offer. Patient responses allowed a comparison of perceived readiness to receive an offer call before and after viewing mockups.
Results: We identified themes relating to the offer process, repetition and timing of education, and standardization and tailoring of content. The results indicated a gap in available education after the evaluation session, and information specific to offer decisions is needed. Patient feedback emphasized the need to review the offer process before a real offer.
Conclusions: Patients and providers responded favorably to a patient tool addressing existing gaps in education while waiting for a donor offer. Additional patient, family, and provider feedback will guide the development of an interactive tool to prepare patients and families for an offer decision.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31469394 Free PMC article.
-
Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.Liver Transpl. 2020 Mar;26(3):337-348. doi: 10.1002/lt.25715. Liver Transpl. 2020. PMID: 31923342 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820528
-
The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Mar 12;13(2):169-211. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1973. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447040 Review.
-
Evidence Brief: Comparative Effectiveness of Appointment Recall Reminder Procedures for Follow-up Appointments [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2015 Jul. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2015 Jul. PMID: 27606388 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic review on the involvement and engagement of patients as advisers for the organisation of organ transplantation services.BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e072091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072091. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37164468 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, et al. . OPTN/SRTR 2016 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18:172–253. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
