Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 11;118(19):e2018784118.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018784118.

Cognitive impairment after focal brain lesions is better predicted by damage to structural than functional network hubs

Affiliations

Cognitive impairment after focal brain lesions is better predicted by damage to structural than functional network hubs

Justin Reber et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Hubs are highly connected brain regions important for coordinating processing in brain networks. It is unclear, however, which measures of network "hubness" are most useful in identifying brain regions critical to human cognition. We tested how closely two measures of hubness-edge density and participation coefficient, derived from white and gray matter, respectively-were associated with general cognitive impairment after brain damage in two large cohorts of patients with focal brain lesions (N = 402 and 102, respectively) using cognitive tests spanning multiple cognitive domains. Lesions disrupting white matter regions with high edge density were associated with cognitive impairment, whereas lesions damaging gray matter regions with high participation coefficient had a weaker, less consistent association with cognitive outcomes. Similar results were observed with six other gray matter hubness measures. This suggests that damage to densely connected white matter regions is more cognitively impairing than similar damage to gray matter hubs, helping to explain interindividual differences in cognitive outcomes after brain damage.

Keywords: brain networks; edge density; functional connectivity; participation coefficient; structural connectivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Lesion overlaps and network measures. Overlap map of all participants’ lesions in (A) the Iowa cohort. The distribution of edge density and participation coefficient are represented in B and C, respectively. Validation analyses were carried out in the WU cohort (D). The images are presented in radiological orientation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Lesion load calculation pipeline. Lesions were traced on the patient’s structural MRI, then transformed to a template brain. The resulting lesions were then overlaid on the edge density and participation coefficient maps, which were derived from healthy subjects, and the sum of all voxels within the lesion volume was calculated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van den Heuvel M. P., Sporns O., Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J. Neurosci. 31, 15775–15786 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sporns O., Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 652–660 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Bertolero M. A., Yeo B. T. T., Bassett D. S., D’Esposito M., A mechanistic model of connector hubs, modularity and cognition. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 765–777 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gratton C., Nomura E. M., Pérez F., D’Esposito M., Focal brain lesions to critical locations cause widespread disruption of the modular organization of the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 1275–1285 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffa A., Baumann P. S., Thiran J.-P., Hagmann P., Structural connectomics in brain diseases. Neuroimage 80, 515–526 (2013). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources