Comparison of appropriateness of Nutri-Score and other front-of-pack nutrition labels across a group of Moroccan consumers: awareness, understanding and food choices
- PMID: 33957970
- PMCID: PMC8101098
- DOI: 10.1186/s13690-021-00595-3
Comparison of appropriateness of Nutri-Score and other front-of-pack nutrition labels across a group of Moroccan consumers: awareness, understanding and food choices
Abstract
Background: The front of pack nutrition label Nutri-Score, intended to help consumers orient their choices towards foods that are more favorable to health, was developed in France and applied in several European countries. Consideration is underway for its use in Morocco. This study aims to assess Moroccan consumers' perception and objective understanding of Nutri-Score and 4 other nutritional information labels (Health Star Rating, Health warning, Reference Intakes and Multiple Trafic Light) and their impact on purchase intentions.
Methods: 814 participants were asked to choose among 3 food classes (yoghurts, biscuits and cold cuts), which ones they would prefer to buy among three products with different nutritional profiles and then to rank them according to their nutritional quality. Participants first performed these tasks without a visible nutritional label, and then, after being randomized to one of five labels tested, with the nutritional label visible on front of packs. Next, the full set of tested labels was presented to the participants who were asked a series of questions regarding their preferences, the attractiveness of the labels, their perceptions, intention to use and the trustworthiness placed in the labels.
Results: Compared to the Reference Intake, the Nutri-Score (OR = 2.48 [1.53-4.05], p < 0.0001), was associated with the highest improvement in the ability to correctly classify foods based on their nutritional quality. The percentage of participants who improved their food choice was higher than those who worsened it for all the labels. For yogurts and cookies, the most significant improvements were observed for the Nutri-Score and the Reference Intakes: Concerning the perception of labels, the Nutri-Score is the label that received the highest number of positive responses, whether concerning the ease of being spotted (82.2%), of being understood (74%), and to provide rapid information (68.8%). The Nutri-Score was ranked as the preferred label by 64.9% of the participants.
Conclusion: The Nutri-Score appears to be the most effective nutritional information system to inform consumers about the nutritional quality of foods in Morocco, where it could constitute a useful tool to help consumers in their food choices in situations of purchase.
Keywords: Food choice; Front-of-pack nutrition labels; Moroccan consumers; Nutritional policy; Objective understanding; Perception of labels.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Compared to other front-of-pack nutrition labels, the Nutri-Score emerged as the most efficient to inform Swiss consumers on the nutritional quality of food products.PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0228179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228179. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32107489 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels among Italian Consumers: Results from an Online Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients. 2020 Jul 31;12(8):2307. doi: 10.3390/nu12082307. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32752021 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Objective understanding of the Nutri-score front-of-pack label by European consumers and its effect on food choices: an online experimental study.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 19;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01053-z. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020. PMID: 33213459 Free PMC article.
-
International evidence for the effectiveness of the front-of-package nutrition label called Nutri-Score.Cent Eur J Public Health. 2021 Mar;29(1):76-79. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a6239. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33831290 Review.
-
Front-of-pack (FOP) labelling systems to improve the quality of nutrition information to prevent obesity: NutrInform Battery vs Nutri-Score.Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Jun;27(5):1575-1584. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01316-z. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Eat Weight Disord. 2022. PMID: 34664216 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evidence on consumers' perceptions, understanding and uses of the Nutri-Score to improve communication about its update: a qualitative study with shopping observations in France.BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 4;24(1):3037. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20092-w. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39497099 Free PMC article.
-
Study on knowledge of front-of-pack labeling and food group-based dietary intake among chronic gastritis patients.J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Sep;12(9):2128-2133. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_322_23. Epub 2023 Sep 30. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 38024917 Free PMC article.
-
A Little Bird Told Me… Nutri-Score Panoramas from a Flight over Europe, Connecting Science and Society.Nutrients. 2023 Jul 28;15(15):3367. doi: 10.3390/nu15153367. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37571304 Free PMC article.
-
A 20-Country Comparative Assessment of the Effectiveness of Nutri-Score vs. NutrInform Battery Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels on Consumer Subjective Understanding and Liking.Nutrients. 2023 Jun 23;15(13):2852. doi: 10.3390/nu15132852. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37447177 Free PMC article.
-
Food Front-of-Pack Labelling and the Nutri-Score Nutrition Label-Poland-Wide Cross-Sectional Expert Opinion Study.Foods. 2023 Jun 12;12(12):2346. doi: 10.3390/foods12122346. Foods. 2023. PMID: 37372557 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ministry of Health: national survey on common risk factors for noncommunicable diseases 2017–2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/STEPS-REPORT-2017-2018-Moroc.... (Accessed 01.11.2020).
-
- HCP, "National survey on household living standards in Morocco", 2006-2007. Available online: https://www.hcp.ma/downloads/Niveau-de-vie-et-pauvrete-Enquete-nationale.... (Accessed 01.11.2020).
-
- Naghavi M, Abajobir A, Abbafati C, Abbas K, Abd-Allah F, Abera S, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1151–1210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization . WHO Technical Report Series; 916. Geneva, Switzeland: WHO; 2003. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. - PubMed
-
- Lim S, Vos T, Flaxman A, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
