Background and purpose: Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® offers a possible therapeutic approach in septic shock, but modes of application and dosing are still undetermined.
Materials and methods: Data from surgical patients with septic shock, treated with hemoadsorption adjunctive to renal replacement therapy were analyzed retrospectively. The 28-day mortality was compared to predicted mortality.
Results: In 70 patients (70.6 ± 13.3 years), hemoadsorption was applied for 85.6 ± 53.8 h. The APACHE ll (30.2 ± 6.3) calculated to a predicted mortality of 73.3%, while the observed mortality was significantly lower (50%, p < 0.05). The amount of blood purified was higher in survivors than in non-survivors (8.5 ± 4.4 vs. 6.1 ± 3.6 l/kgBW, p = 0.017). We identified three clusters of <6 l/kgBW, 6-13 l/kgBW and ≥ 13 l/kgBW with a linear dose-response relation between blood purification volume and survival, which was best in the highest volume cluster (83.3%; p = 0.045).
Conclusions: The application of CytoSorb® seems to be effective in various conditions of septic shock. In a cohort of most severely ill patients the observed mortality was lower than predicted and decreased linearly with blood purification volumes inadvertently exceeding 6 l/kg BW. These results suggest that hemoadsorption might improve survival provided that the applied dose is high enough.
Keywords: CytoSorb®; Cytokine storm; Hemoadsorption; SIRS; Septic shock.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.