Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;69(9):2518-2523.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17223. Epub 2021 May 12.

A tailored flexible vaginal pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse in older women

Ronen S Gold  1   2 , Yoav Baruch  1   2 , Hadar Amir  1   2 , David Gordon  1   2 , Asnat Groutz  1   2
Affiliations

A tailored flexible vaginal pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse in older women

Ronen S Gold et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To present a flexible protocol of vaginal pessaries for older women with significant pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Design: A prospective cohort study of 140 consecutive older women (aged ≥65 years) with significant POP treated with individually fitted vaginal pessaries. After initial insertion, each patient was invited for a first evaluation after 1 month and subsequent follow-ups at increasing intervals of 1 month. During each examination, the pessary was removed and the vagina was inspected for infection, bleeding, or erosions. All patients were advised to use a vaginal estrogen cream twice a week.

Setting: The study was conducted during 2020 in the urogynecology clinic of a tertiary medical center.

Participants: The study cohort included 140 consecutive older women with significant and symptomatic POP treated with vaginal pessaries.

Main outcome: Primary outcomes included time intervals between follow-up visits, pessary-associated complications, need to change the pessary, need to remove the pessary temporarily, and whether the patients eventually underwent POP surgery.

Results: The mean age of the patients at the time of pessary fitting was 76.7 ± 9.2 years (range 65-100 years). Mean interval between follow-up examinations was 3.3 ± 1.1 months (range 1-6 months). Most patients (83.6%) used a ring pessary with support, but only a small number of patients were able to maintain the pessary by themselves. Of the 140 patients, five (3.6%) patients only eventually underwent POP surgery, and in 11 (7.9%) patients, the vaginal pessary had to be removed for 2-4 weeks because of significant vaginal discharge or superficial erosions. Additionally, 12 (8.6%) patients developed stress urinary incontinence following pessary insertion.

Conclusions: Customized management with vaginal pessary for symptomatic POP in older women is effective and safe, and is a suitable therapeutic alternative for older women who are unable or unwilling to undergo reconstructive pelvic surgery.

Keywords: complications; efficacy; older women; patient's satisfaction; pelvic organ prolapse; vaginal pessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Geriatrics.
    Griebling TL. Griebling TL. J Urol. 2022 Mar;207(3):712-714. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002367. Epub 2021 Dec 16. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 34911338 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783-1790.
    1. Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201-1206.
    1. Wu JM, Dieter AA, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Cumulative incidence of a subsequent surgery after stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):1124-1130.
    1. Am MS, Lee VYT, Yu ELM, et al. The effect of time interval of vaginal ring pessary replacement for pelvic organ prolapse on complications and patient satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial. Maturitas. 2019;128:29-35.
    1. Propst K, Mellen C, O'Sullivan DM, Tulikangas PK. Timing of office-based pessary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):100-105.

LinkOut - more resources