The Value Surgical Services Bring to Critical Access Hospitals

Nathanael N Hoskins; Marco A Cunicelli; Wade Hopper; Robert Zeller; Ning Cheng; Tom Lindsey

doi:10.7759/cureus.14367

The Value Surgical Services Bring to Critical Access Hospitals

Cureus. 2021 Apr 8;13(4):e14367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14367.

Authors

Nathanael N Hoskins¹, Marco A Cunicelli¹, Wade Hopper², Robert Zeller², Ning Cheng³, Tom Lindsey²

Affiliations

¹ Surgery, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, USA.
² Surgery, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, USA.
³ Biostatistics, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Auburn, USA.

Abstract

Purpose Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) serve rural populations and receive government subsidies to compensate for their relatively high overhead costs and low occupancy rates. Twenty-nine percent of all hospitalizations in the United States include a surgical procedure, and hospitalizations involving surgery accounted for nearly half of all hospital revenue in 2011. This study aims to determine the value surgical services bring to CAHs and their impact on the viability of these facilities. Methods Public access data from the American Hospital Directory (AHD) was analyzed about each hospital's revenue and surgical services offered. Excel was utilized to randomly select 300 CAHs from a pool of 1350 CAHs based on a 95% confidence interval and a 5% margin of error. Linear regression models were fit to the data evaluating the association of net income with the number of surgical services offered per hospital and the association of total margin with the number of surgical services offered per hospital. Models were adjusted for location, occupancy rate, and case mix index. Findings The linear regression model demonstrated that for every additional surgical service provided by a CAH, the hospital net income increased by $630,528 (p=0.0032). A similar trend was observed when modeling profitability. The total margin increased 0.73% for each additional surgical service added, albeit without statistical significance (p=0.1342). CAHs providing two or three surgical services showed tighter group variance than those not offering surgery or only offering one surgical service. Conclusions Net income was significantly correlated to the number of surgical services offered at CAHs. Furthermore, CAHs offering more surgical services seem to have more predictable profits than those offering less surgical services. CAHs would financially benefit from offering more or expanding surgical services at their facilities.

Keywords: critical access hospital; hospital profitability; hospital sustainability; hospital viability; net income; rural hospital; rural surgery.