Ethics, economics, and endocarditis. The physician's role in resource allocation

Arch Intern Med. 1988 Aug;148(8):1809-11.


Medical decisions are increasingly shaped by financial considerations. Biomedical ethicists have encouraged the practicing physician to remain the agent of the individual patient, sometimes pitting physicians against health care institutions. The limitation of medical resources has given rise to the need for a clear conceptual basis for allocating scarce resources. The role of resource gatekeeper may be used to the indigent patient's disadvantage when the principles of triage are used incorrectly in situations of relative scarcity. To allocate limited resources fairly under changing policy and economic conditions, health care institutions should ensure that systematic processes, such as those of ethics consultants and committees, are readily available to help resolve problematic cases and policies. Physicians with clinical judgment and a primary commitment to patient care must assume active roles in these processes in order to build an ethically sound framework for clinical decision making in times of relatively scarce resources.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cost Control
  • Endocarditis, Bacterial / economics
  • Endocarditis, Bacterial / etiology
  • Endocarditis, Bacterial / surgery
  • Ethicists
  • Ethics Committees, Clinical
  • Ethics, Medical*
  • Health Resources* / statistics & numerical data
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Medical Indigency
  • Patient Selection*
  • Resource Allocation*
  • Substance-Related Disorders / complications