Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 May 20:22:e930305.
doi: 10.12659/AJCR.930305.

Pronounced Dead Twice: What Should an Attending Physician Do in Between?

Affiliations
Case Reports

Pronounced Dead Twice: What Should an Attending Physician Do in Between?

Annie Bao et al. Am J Case Rep. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) is a well-accepted practice in the medical, philosophical, and legal fields. It is important to determine the amount of time required for the loss of circulation to lead to irreversible brain loss, and ultimately brain death. CASE REPORT We report a rare case of organ donation after cardiac death. During organ procurement, it was noted that the patient's aortic and renal arteries were pumping and pulsing, and her cardiopulmonary activities were back to unexpected levels. The organ procurement surgery was stopped. At the time, the patient was given Fentanyl and Lorazepam. Subsequently, she was pronounced dead again 18 minutes after she was initially pronounced dead. After a complete autopsy, the cause of death was determined to be acute Fentanyl toxicity due to a Fentanyl injection in the hospital. The manner of death was determined to be homicide. CONCLUSIONS What should an attending physician do in the rare case that the organ procurement team notices the patient is still alive? It is our opinion that: first, the organ procurement team should leave the room immediately and withdraw from the case, and second, the attending physician should let nature run its course and refrain from excessive medical intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Conflict of Interest

None.

Similar articles

References

    1. Potter J. Imminent death donation: Ethical and practical policy considerations. J Law Med Ethics. 2018;46(2):524–37. - PubMed
    1. Sprenkeler DJ, van Hout Gerardus PJ, Chamuleau SAJ. Lazarus in asystole: A case report of autoresuscitation after prolonged cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J. 2019;3(3):ytz134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hannig KE, Hauritz RW, Grove EL. Autoresuscitation: A case and discussion of the Lazarus phenomenon. Case Rep Med. 2015;2015:724174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hornby K, Hornby L, Shemie SD. A systematic review of autoresuscitation after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(5):1246–53. - PubMed
    1. Hornby L, Dhanani S, Shemie SD. Update of a systematic review of autoresuscitation after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(3):e268–72. - PubMed

Publication types