Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;27(6):1381-1389.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13575. Epub 2021 May 20.

Provider and coach perspectives on implementing shadow coaching to improve provider-patient interactions

Affiliations

Provider and coach perspectives on implementing shadow coaching to improve provider-patient interactions

Denise D Quigley et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare organizations want to improve patient care experiences. Some use 'shadow coaching' to improve interactions between providers and patients. A Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) implemented a half-day observation of individual primary-care providers by a 'shadow coach' during real-time patient visits, including an in-person verbal debrief afterwards and a written report with specific recommendations. Shadow coaching identified areas for improvement. We aimed to characterize lessons and barriers to implementing shadow coaching as a mechanism to improve interactions with patients and change organizational culture.

Methods: We examined provider and coach perceptions of shadow coaching through interviewing coached providers, stratified by provider type and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) performance, and the coaches who coached the most providers. We interviewed 19 coached providers and 2 coaches in a large, urban FQHC. Content analysis identified implementation barriers, facilitators and themes.

Results: Coaches reported needing 'buy-in' throughout the organization and the need to be credible and empathize with the providers being coached. Most providers reported behaviour changes based on recommendations. Almost all providers recalled at least one coaching recommendation that was actionable. Providers and coaches highlighted patient-level and practise-level barriers that impeded their ability to implement recommended improvements. CAHPS data was reported as an effective performance management metric for measuring change, counselling providers, and evaluating provider-level efforts but was not always specific enough to yield tangible recommendations.

Conclusions: Regular messaging by leadership about the priority and purpose of shadow coaching was essential for both physician engagement and its mature implementation across the organization. Coaching could be embedded into a long-term strategy of professional development with periodic re-coaching. Re-coaching sessions could target issues raised by providers, such as dealing with difficult patients or specific populations. Research on the timing and content of re-coaching is needed.

Keywords: patient experiences; primary care; provider communication; provider-patient interactions; shadow coaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: All authors declare there are no conflicts of interest

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berwick DM. A user's manual for the IOM's 'Quality Chasm' report. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:80–90. - PubMed
    1. Davies E, Shaller D, Edgman-Levitan S, et al. Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative. Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. 2008;11:160–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Quigley DD, Mendel PJ, Predmore ZS, Chen AY, Hays RD. Use of CAHPS((R)) patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015;7:41–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolever R, Moore M, Jordan M. Coaching in Healthcare. In: Bachkirova T, Spence G, Drake D, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Coaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2016.

LinkOut - more resources