Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis
- PMID: 34021793
- PMCID: PMC9596554
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03955-4
Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of single anterior and single posterior approach of debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis (TB) patients.
Methods: Eighty-seven patients with mono-segment lumbar TB who underwent debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation through either single anterior (Group A) or single posterior approach (Group B) from January 2007 to January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The duration of the operation, blood loss, complication rate, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Frankel scale, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), kyphosis angle, correction rate, correction loss, and time taken for bone graft fusion were compared between the groups.
Results: The average period of follow-up was 34.3 ± 9.5 months (24-56 months). No significant differences were observed between patients in Group A and patients in Group B in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), duration of illness and preoperative evaluative indices (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.000), along with a slightly higher rate of complications compared with Group B (P = 0.848). The VAS, ODI and Frankel scale scores showed significant improvement in both groups (P = 0.000), along with the ESR, CRP and kyphosis indices (P = 0.000), which were similar in both groups at the final follow-up.
Conclusion: Both single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement, interbody fusion and fixation are effective for mono-segment lumbar TB patients, although the single posterior approach is of a shorter duration and results in less blood loss.
Keywords: Anterior; Lumbar; Mono-segment; Posterior; Spinal tuberculosis.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Posterior-only debridement, bone fusion, single-segment versus short-segment instrumentation for mono-segmental lumbar or lumbosacral pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: minimum five year follow-up outcomes.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 12;17(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03269-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 35962360 Free PMC article.
-
One-stage posterior debridement and single-segment interbody fusion for treating mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis in adults following minimum 5-year follow-up.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 14;15(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02005-w. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 33054798 Free PMC article.
-
[Minimally invasive direct lateral approach debridement, interbody bone grafting, and interbody fusion combined with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar spinal tuberculosis].Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Mar 25;34(3):228-34. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.03.008. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021. PMID: 33787166 Chinese.
-
Single Posterior Surgery Versus Combined Posterior-Anterior Surgery for Lumbar Tuberculosis Patients.Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):868-877. doi: 10.1111/os.13628. Epub 2023 Jan 19. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 36655386 Free PMC article.
-
Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: A single-center retrospective comparative study.Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Sep 11. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32927138
Cited by
-
Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Spinal Tuberculosis Focus Removal versus Posterior Pedicle Lesion Removal, Bone Grafting, and Internal Fixation Combined with Drug Chemotherapy for Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis.Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Feb 26;17:733-748. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S449684. eCollection 2024. Infect Drug Resist. 2024. PMID: 38433783 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Strategies for Bone Tuberculosis Management.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jan 29;17(2):170. doi: 10.3390/ph17020170. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38399384 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical outcomes and surgical strategy for spine tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine Deform. 2024 Mar;12(2):271-291. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00785-9. Epub 2023 Nov 17. Spine Deform. 2024. PMID: 37975989 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beneficial influence of single-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of lumbar brucella spondylitis combined with spondylolisthesis.Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 14;12(1):19459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24223-4. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36376442 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple Spinal Tuberculosis with Severe Kyphosis: A Case Report.Front Surg. 2022 Apr 1;9:815514. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.815514. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35433813 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Peghin M, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Sanchez-Montalva A, Pellisé F, Rivas A, Tortola T, Aguilar J, Almirante B, Pigrau C. The changing epidemiology of spinal tuberculosis: the influence of international immigration in Catalonia, 1993–2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145(10):2152–2160. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000863. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
