Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;142(12):3643-3649.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03955-4. Epub 2021 May 22.

Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis

Affiliations

Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis

Hangli Wu et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of single anterior and single posterior approach of debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis (TB) patients.

Methods: Eighty-seven patients with mono-segment lumbar TB who underwent debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation through either single anterior (Group A) or single posterior approach (Group B) from January 2007 to January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The duration of the operation, blood loss, complication rate, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Frankel scale, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), kyphosis angle, correction rate, correction loss, and time taken for bone graft fusion were compared between the groups.

Results: The average period of follow-up was 34.3 ± 9.5 months (24-56 months). No significant differences were observed between patients in Group A and patients in Group B in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), duration of illness and preoperative evaluative indices (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.000), along with a slightly higher rate of complications compared with Group B (P = 0.848). The VAS, ODI and Frankel scale scores showed significant improvement in both groups (P = 0.000), along with the ESR, CRP and kyphosis indices (P = 0.000), which were similar in both groups at the final follow-up.

Conclusion: Both single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement, interbody fusion and fixation are effective for mono-segment lumbar TB patients, although the single posterior approach is of a shorter duration and results in less blood loss.

Keywords: Anterior; Lumbar; Mono-segment; Posterior; Spinal tuberculosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for patients enrolled
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 73-year-old male patient with L2–3 mono-segmental spinal TB, who complained of severe back pain for 7 months, received single anterior debridement, interbody fusion and vertebral fixation. a, b Preoperative X-ray of AP and lateral images show lumbar degeneration and loss of L2-3 intervertebral height. c, d Preoperative CT and MRI images show the destruction of vertebral bodies and disc. e, f Postoperative X-ray of AP and lateral images show good position of vertebral screw fixation. g, h Postoperative CT images show solid interbody fusion had been achieved at the postoperative 24th month
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 29-year-old male patient with L2–3 mono-segmental spinal TB, who complained of severe low back pain for 3 months, received single posterior debridement, interbody fusion and pedicle fixation. a, b Preoperative X-ray of AP and lateral images show roughly normal radiological presentation. c, d Preoperative CT and MRI images show the destruction of vertebral bodies and disc. e, f Postoperative X-ray of AP and lateral images show good position of pedicle screw fixation. g, h Postoperative CT images show solid interbody fusion had been achieved at the postoperative 24th month

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peghin M, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Sanchez-Montalva A, Pellisé F, Rivas A, Tortola T, Aguilar J, Almirante B, Pigrau C. The changing epidemiology of spinal tuberculosis: the influence of international immigration in Catalonia, 1993–2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145(10):2152–2160. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000863. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De la Garza RR, Goodwin CR, Abu-Bonsrah N, Bydon A, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Sciubba DM. The epidemiology of spinal tuberculosis in the United States: an analysis of 2002–2011 data. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;26(4):507–512. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16174. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheung WY, Luk KDK. Clinical and radiological outcomes after conservative treatment of TB spondylitis: is the 15 years' follow-up in the MRC study long enough? Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 4):594–602. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2332-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajasekaran S, Soundarapandian S. Progression of kyphosis in tuberculosis of the spine treated by anterior arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1989;71(9):1314–1323. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(89)80102-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khanna K, Sabharwal S. Spinal tuberculosis: a comprehensive review for the modern spine surgeon. Spine J. 2019;19(11):1858–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.002. - DOI - PubMed

Substances