Minipool testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in United States blood donors
- PMID: 34046906
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.16511
Minipool testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in United States blood donors
Abstract
Background: SARS-CoV-2 RNA prevalence in blood donors from large geographic areas of high community transmission is limited. We tested residual donor plasma minipools (MPs) to determine SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia prevalence in six United States areas.
Study design/methods: Blood donations collected from 7 March 2020 to 25 September 2020 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA (vRNA) in MP of 6 or 16 donations using the Grifols Procleix SARS-CoV-2 research-use only (RUO) transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay. Reactive results were confirmed using an alternate target region TMA assay. Reactive MPs were tested by TMA after serial dilution to estimate viral load. Testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and infectivity was performed.
Results: A total of 17,995 MPs corresponding to approximately 258,000 donations were tested for vRNA. Three confirmed reactive MP16 were identified. The estimated prevalence of vRNA reactive donations was 1.16/100,000 (95% CI 0.40, 3.42). The vRNA-reactive samples were non-reactive for antibody, and the estimated viral loads of the (presumed single) positive donations within each MP ranged from <1000 to <4000 copies/ml. When tested, no infectivity was observed in inoculated permissive cell cultures.
Discussion: Blood donation MP-nucleic acid testing (NAT) indicated that SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia is infrequent and, when detected, the vRNA was at low concentrations. Only one RNA-reactive MP could be tested for infectivity for operational reasons and was not infectious in cell culture. These findings support current recommendations from international and national regulatory agencies to not screen donors by NAT.
Keywords: RNAemia; SARS-CoV-2; blood donors; minipool; plasma; transcription-mediated amplification.
© 2021 AABB.
Similar articles
-
Low rate of RNAemia in blood donations collected during the first wave of COVID-19 in France.Transfusion. 2022 Mar;62(3):633-640. doi: 10.1111/trf.16812. Epub 2022 Feb 9. Transfusion. 2022. PMID: 35089597
-
No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA among blood donors: A multicenter study in Hubei, China.Transfusion. 2020 Sep;60(9):2038-2046. doi: 10.1111/trf.15943. Epub 2020 Jul 14. Transfusion. 2020. PMID: 32666556 Free PMC article.
-
Investigational Testing for Zika Virus among U.S. Blood Donors.N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1778-1788. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714977. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29742375
-
Risk of transfusion-transmitted infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from blood donors in Japan.Transfusion. 2024 Jan;64(1):116-123. doi: 10.1111/trf.17622. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Transfusion. 2024. PMID: 38088084
-
Risk of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by transfusion: A literature review.Transfusion. 2020 Dec;60(12):3046-3054. doi: 10.1111/trf.16056. Epub 2020 Sep 1. Transfusion. 2020. PMID: 32798237 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patient and Immunological Factors Associated With Delayed Clearance of Mucosal Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 RNA and Symptom Persistence.J Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 16;230(2):357-362. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae132. J Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38470857
-
Testing of tissue specimens obtained from SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab-positive donors.Cell Tissue Bank. 2024 Jun;25(2):583-604. doi: 10.1007/s10561-023-10119-8. Epub 2023 Nov 23. Cell Tissue Bank. 2024. PMID: 37995051 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging Pathogen Threats in Transfusion Medicine: Improving Safety and Confidence with Pathogen Reduction Technologies.Pathogens. 2023 Jul 5;12(7):911. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12070911. Pathogens. 2023. PMID: 37513758 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Low rate of detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in deceased tissue donors.Cell Tissue Bank. 2023 Sep;24(3):585-596. doi: 10.1007/s10561-022-10054-0. Epub 2022 Dec 9. Cell Tissue Bank. 2023. PMID: 36484950 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic and How Blood Operators Can Prepare for the Next Pandemic.Viruses. 2022 Sep 27;14(10):2126. doi: 10.3390/v14102126. Viruses. 2022. PMID: 36298680 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Byambasuren O, Cardona M, Bell K, Clark J, McLaws ML, Glasziou P. Estimating the extent of asymptomatic COVID-19 and its potential for community transmission: systematic review and meta-analysis. Off J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2020;5:223-34.
-
- Cevik M, Tate M, Lloyd O, Maraolo AE, Schafers J, Ho A. SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2:e13-22.
-
- Rolfes MA, Grijalva CG, Zhu Y, et al. Implications of shortened quarantine among household contacts of index patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection - Tennessee and Wisconsin, April-September 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;69:1633-7.
-
- Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497-506.
-
- Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, Lu R, Han K, Wu G, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020;323:1843-4.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
