Comparative evaluation of surface-modified zirconia for the growth of bone cells and early osseointegration

J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jul;126(1):92.e1-92.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 May 26.

Abstract

Statement of problem: Rapid osseointegration between implant and bone tissue for early loading of a prosthesis with sufficient primary stability depends on the surface characteristics of the implant. The development and characterization of suitable surface coatings on dental implants is a major challenge.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the osteogenic potential and cytotoxicity of unmodified zirconia, acid-etched zirconia, bioactive glass-coated zirconia, and tamarind kernel polysaccharide with hydrophilic acrylic acid (TKP-AA) hydrogel-coated zirconia.

Material and methods: Thirty-six disks each of unmodified zirconia, acid-etched, 45S5 bioactive glass-coated, and TKP-AA hydrogel-coated zirconia were evaluated for osteogenic potential and cytotoxic effect by using human osteoblast Saos-2 cells. The surface topography of the disks and the morphology of the cells grown on these surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (n=3). The cell attachment was evaluated by confocal imaging (n=3). The cytotoxic effect was evaluated by cell viability assay (n=9). Osteoblast maturation was assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay (n=9) and cell mineralization by alizarin red staining (n=9). ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the intergroup differences in these characteristics (α=.05).

Results: The surface modifications resulted in distinct changes in the surface morphology of zirconia disks and the growth of Saos-2 cells. Zirconia disks coated with TKP-AA promoted higher proliferation of osteoblasts compared with unmodified disks (P<.001). Similarly, the surface modifications significantly increased the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to osteoblasts as compared with uncoated zirconia (P<.001). However, the rate of differentiation to osteoblasts was similar among the surface modifications. Acid-etched and TKP-AA-coated disks promoted mineralization of osteoblasts to the same extent, except bioactive glass coating, which significantly increased the rate of mineralization (P<.001).

Conclusions: Surface modification of zirconia by acid etching and coating with Bioglass or TKP-AA hydrogel resulted in the improved growth and differentiation of osteoblasts. TKP-AA hydrogel coating promoted the proliferation of osteoblasts, whereas Bioglass coating showed better mineralization. TKP-AA hydrogel coating is a promising candidate for improving the osseointegration of dental implants that warrants further investigation.

MeSH terms

  • Cell Proliferation
  • Dental Implants*
  • Humans
  • Osseointegration*
  • Osteoblasts
  • Surface Properties
  • Titanium
  • Zirconium

Substances

  • Dental Implants
  • Zirconium
  • Titanium
  • zirconium oxide