High-throughput immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 - considerable differences in performance when comparing three methods

Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Oct;53(10):805-810. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1931434. Epub 2021 May 29.

Abstract

Background: The recently launched high-throughput assays for detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has contributed to the managing strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the performance of three high-throughput assays and one rapid lateral flow test relative to regulatory authorities' recommended criteria.

Methods: A total of 315 samples, including 150 pre-pandemic samples, 152 samples from SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive individuals and 13 potentially cross-reactive samples were analysed with SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL), Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche, Solna, Sweden), LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy) and 2019-nCOV IgG/IgM Rapid Test (Dynamiker Biotechnology Co., Tianjin, China).

Results: All assays performed with a high level of specificity ranging from 96.7% to 99.3%. Sensitivity differed more between the assays, Roche exhibiting the highest sensitivity of 98.7%. The corresponding figures for Abbott, DiaSorin and Dynamiker Biotechnology were 80.9%, 89.0% and 72.4%, respectively.

Conclusions: The results of the evaluated SARS-CoV-2 assays vary considerably, as well as their ability to fulfil the performance criteria proposed by regulatory authorities. Introduction into clinical use in low-prevalent settings, should, therefore, be made with caution.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; immunology; serology.

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • COVID-19*
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay
  • Pandemics
  • SARS-CoV-2*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral